Hi all guys just to let you know I'm going to add the bval-extras module + packages according to Donald's suggestion. Have a nice day, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for bval-extras > > LieGrue, > strub > > PS: please look at BVAL-1 ;) > > --- On Wed, 12/8/10, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Donald Woods <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Adding aux constraints >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 3:58 PM >> bval-extras or bval-validator sounds >> good. >> I'd try the following mappings: >> >> org/apache/commons/validator/*Validator -> >> org.apache.bval.extras.constraints.*Validator >> >> org/apache/commons/validator/routines/*Validator -> >> org.apache.bval.extras.constraints.routines.*Validator >> >> Looking at bval-jsr303, we currently have our constraints >> under >> org.apache.bval.constraints, which we should probably >> change over to >> org.apache.bval.jsr303.constraints to really denote these >> are only the >> spec required ones. >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> On 12/7/10 3:55 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> > Hi Donald, >> > thanks for your feedback, what about adding a new >> module 'bval-extras' >> > where putting all non-JSR303 constraints? >> > Thanks in advance, have a nice day, >> > Simo >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> > http://www.99soft.org/ >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Sounds like a good idea, but we need to somehow >> distinguish between the >> >> JSR required constraints and any extras we >> supply. So, any non-JSR >> >> required constraints would not go into the >> bval-jsr303 module, but >> >> should go somewhere else (don't have a good >> suggestion right now.....) >> >> >> >> >> >> -Donald >> >> >> >> >> >> On 12/2/10 9:13 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >>> Hi all guys, >> >>> I think it could be good and I'd like to >> propose to add/migrate the >> >>> existing commons-validator routines[1] into >> our constraints[2] >> >>> package, what do you think? >> >>> Many thanks in advance, >> >>> Simo >> >>> >> >>> [1] >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ >> >>> [2] >> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/ >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >>> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > > > >
