Hi Mark! I honestly think that, even if I don't like the BVAL acronym, since we already released artifacts with bval-* prefix, BVAL should be the name of the project.
Just my 0.02 cents, all the best! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > While running the VOTE on general@incubator, I spotted a problem with the > project name in our graduation proposal > > "Apache Bean Validation" > > > is imo just too similar to the spec name itself > > "Bean Validation" > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=303 > > Although it's not trademarked, it might not really be trademarkable at all! > > I think that "BeanValidation" might serve us better, or even use "Apache > BVAL" as project name. > > I now updated our graduation proposal to "BeanValidation" > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/Graduation+Proposal > > Is this ok for anyone? > Or should we go for BVAL at all? > > LieGrue, > strub >
