+1 for Apache BVal +1 for Apache OpenBeanValidation -1 for Apache BeanValidation (too similar compared to the name of the spec. - at least it might be confusing for users,...)
regards, gerhard 2012/1/10 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]> > Hi Mark! > > I honestly think that, even if I don't like the BVAL acronym, since we > already released artifacts with bval-* prefix, BVAL should be the name > of the project. > > Just my 0.02 cents, all the best! > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks! > > > > While running the VOTE on general@incubator, I spotted a problem with > the project name in our graduation proposal > > > > "Apache Bean Validation" > > > > > > is imo just too similar to the spec name itself > > > > "Bean Validation" > > > > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=303 > > > > Although it's not trademarked, it might not really be trademarkable at > all! > > > > I think that "BeanValidation" might serve us better, or even use "Apache > BVAL" as project name. > > > > I now updated our graduation proposal to "BeanValidation" > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/Graduation+Proposal > > > > Is this ok for anyone? > > Or should we go for BVAL at all? > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > >
