My favourite candidate is    -->   bVal   <--

so far.

LieGrue,
strub


----- Original Message -----
> From: Matt Benson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]; Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:25 PM
> Subject: Re: what's our _exact_ project name now?
> 
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>  txs folks!
>> 
>> 
>>  So I'll CANCEL the vote on [email protected] now.
>> 
>>  I'm also +1 for either BVAL or OpenBeanValidation.
>> 
>> 
>>  I actually like BVAL a bit more, because it is easier to pronounce and it 
> fits better into tweets ;)
> 
> BVAL or BVal?  ;)  Thinking more about this, BVal might look nice with
> a new logo also focusing on a checkmark, disguised as the letter 'V'.
> 
> Matt
> 
>> 
>> 
>>  LieGrue,
>>  strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>>  From: Matt Benson <[email protected]>
>>>  To: [email protected]
>>>  Cc:
>>>  Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:19 PM
>>>  Subject: Re: what's our _exact_ project name now?
>>> 
>>>  On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerhard Petracek 
> <[email protected]>
>>>  wrote:
>>>>   +1 for Apache BVal
>>> 
>>>  Simo's reasoning here is sound:  using the same name as
>>>  already-released artifacts is a sound strategy.
>>> 
>>>>   +1 for Apache OpenBeanValidation
>>> 
>>>  There is also good reason to consider this name IMO, as it conforms
>>>  nicely alongside OpenEJB, OpenJPA and OpenWebBeans.
>>> 
>>>  I don't have a strong preference between these two options.
>>> 
>>>  Matt
>>> 
>>>>   -1 for Apache BeanValidation (too similar compared to the name of 
> the spec.
>>>>   - at least it might be confusing for users,...)
>>>> 
>>>>   regards,
>>>>   gerhard
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>   2012/1/10 Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>>>   Hi Mark!
>>>>> 
>>>>>   I honestly think that, even if I don't like the BVAL 
> acronym, since
>>>  we
>>>>>   already released artifacts with bval-* prefix, BVAL should be 
> the name
>>>>>   of the project.
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Just my 0.02 cents, all the best!
>>>>>   -Simo
>>>>> 
>>>>>   http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>>   http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>>>>   http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>>>>   http://www.99soft.org/
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Mark Struberg
>>>  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>   > Hi folks!
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > While running the VOTE on general@incubator, I spotted a 
> problem
>>>  with
>>>>>   the project name in our graduation proposal
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > "Apache Bean Validation"
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > is imo just too similar to the spec name itself
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > "Bean Validation"
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=303
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > Although it's not trademarked, it might not really be
>>>  trademarkable at
>>>>>   all!
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > I think that "BeanValidation" might serve us 
> better, or
>>>  even use "Apache
>>>>>   BVAL" as project name.
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > I now updated our graduation proposal to
>>>  "BeanValidation"
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   >
>>>>> 
>>> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/Graduation+Proposal
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > Is this ok for anyone?
>>>>>   > Or should we go for BVAL at all?
>>>>>   >
>>>>>   > LieGrue,
>>>>>   > strub
>>>>>   >
>>>>> 
>>> 
>

Reply via email to