Generally all in one have power limitations on VHF/UHF.I just bought a
ftdx3000 yeasu myself.You asked about sat operation?Speak to N5AFV he is
the club sat expert.Read reviews before you buy and consider anything that
has been out for less than a year may have problems that have not been
pointed out in the reviews.

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Travis Burgess via BVARC <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Remember, when un-canning worms, if you wish to re-can them, the only way
>  is to use a larger can.
>
> Travis
> K5HTB
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:01:24 -0600
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [BVARC] Can of worms...Which way is best, Shack in a box or two
> boxes?
> From: [email protected]
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am SURE I'm about to open a can of worms here, but I want the advice
> from those I feel most knowledgeable. that being BVARC membership.
>
> I was all ready to buy a new Yaesu FT-991 (the FT-897D replacement) and a
> friend of mind talked me out of it, at least temporarily.
>
> I want to be able to do HF with a decent rig and also be able to Satellite
> and VHF/UHF SSB and weak signal work.
>
> So know I'm wondering if the shack in the box is the best way to go
> (TS-2000, FT-991, IC-9100, etc.) or to go with two boxes, one for HF up to
> 6m or 10m (FT-1200 or FTDX-3000) and another box, perhaps a Yaesu FT-847
> (supposedly renown for satellite and weak signal work).
>
> I'd like advice, suggestions, issue that I might not have thought about,
> about the best way to spend my money.
>
> I've spent the last two months upgrading antennas, now I feel it's my rig
> (FT-897D) is holding me back, at least HF wise.
>
> All thoughts, advice, suggestions, flames and insults are welcome. They
> are even more welcome of you have owned one or more of the shack in a box
> type rig, which I define as 80m- 440mhz, all mode.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> 73, Rob, KC5RET
>
> _______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list
> [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org

Reply via email to