I am very pleased with the IC-7600 transceiver for HF work
Ross - W5HFF
On Friday, December 5, 2014 12:09 PM, Travis Burgess via BVARC
<[email protected]> wrote:
#yiv9295536833 #yiv9295536833 --.yiv9295536833hmmessage
P{margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv9295536833
body.yiv9295536833hmmessage{font-size:12pt;font-family:Calibri;}#yiv9295536833
Remember, when un-canning worms, if you wish to re-can them, the only way
is to use a larger can.
Travis
K5HTB
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:01:24 -0600
To: [email protected]
Subject: [BVARC] Can of worms...Which way is best, Shack in a box or two boxes?
From: [email protected]
Hello all,
I am SURE I'm about to open a can of worms here, but I want the advice from
those I feel most knowledgeable. that being BVARC membership.
I was all ready to buy a new Yaesu FT-991 (the FT-897D replacement) and a
friend of mind talked me out of it, at least temporarily.
I want to be able to do HF with a decent rig and also be able to Satellite and
VHF/UHF SSB and weak signal work.
So know I'm wondering if the shack in the box is the best way to go (TS-2000,
FT-991, IC-9100, etc.) or to go with two boxes, one for HF up to 6m or 10m
(FT-1200 or FTDX-3000) and another box, perhaps a Yaesu FT-847 (supposedly
renown for satellite and weak signal work).
I'd like advice, suggestions, issue that I might not have thought about, about
the best way to spend my money.
I've spent the last two months upgrading antennas, now I feel it's my rig
(FT-897D) is holding me back, at least HF wise.
All thoughts, advice, suggestions, flames and insults are welcome. They are
even more welcome of you have owned one or more of the shack in a box type rig,
which I define as 80m- 440mhz, all mode.
Thanks in advance!
73, Rob, KC5RET
_______________________________________________BVARC mailing
[email protected]http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
