I vote for freedom of speech. If someone post something I don't wanna read, I'll delete it and move on. And least you think I'm not busy in email, I check 18 different email addresses every hour or so. I think I've deleted more than 300 emails just today.
Enjoy life, read and enjoy want you want. And trash the other and move on. My gosh don't let what I may say or post get ur goat. And for heavens sake, as my momma used to say, if you don't let them know where ur goats tied up, they can't get it. Love ya'll, for with out everyone of you, my life would not be as full. I don't say much, but I read and enjoy most of what I do! 73, (Sincerely) KF5HQE, Jeff PS that wasn't political, religious or humorous, was it? Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 2, 2017, at 10:18 AM, John Chauvin via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > > Au contraire. > > It is not that my, and hopefully anyone else's, whole day is consumed with > the reflector. Rather it is that many of us have a busy schedule and have to > sort through this BS to get to our only desire for the reflector - amateur > radio. > > One exception, because of the nature of many amateur radio operators, an > occasional "off topic" is required as a one-time question or similar, but not > leading to a long e-mail trail. I would hope that those that respond to > these occasional requests do so directly and not respond to the entire > reflector. > > IMHO (to quote a internationally acclaimed orator and noble statesman). > > > From: Rick Hiller -- W5RH via BVARC <[email protected]> > To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]> > Cc: Rick Hiller -- W5RH <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 10:03 AM > Subject: Re: [BVARC] Trash on our Amateur Radio reflector > > > Well now, let's see... > > No political comments -- then no discussion about HR555. > > No religious comments -- then no discussion about the propagation, sun spots, > solar storms, because that is Mother Nature/God -- the ultimate OP, no matter > what building you go into Friday, Saturday or Sunday. > > No humorous comments.....oh, no humor, sorry, I'll stop here then. > > C'mon folks, if your whole day is consumed by what comes across the BVARC > reflector and you do not know what a delete key is, then you deserve to be > miserable. Even Dr. Feinman had a sense of humor. > > 73 (sincerely) Rick -- W5RH > > ps...keep complaiing and I will start the wood chuck thread > again....Oh..,,sorry, no humor allowed. My apologies. > > Rick Hiller > The Radio Hotel -- W5RH > > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Pat Cameron via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > I vote for that! ( and the code requirement :-) > > On Apr 2, 2017 8:56 AM, "K5HM" <[email protected]> wrote: > I do not care for political or religious comments but if we ban humor, well, > that is a step too far. > > There is precious little ham humor in our hobby. We all seen to take > ourselves too seriously. Next thing you know, we will be bannibg the > expressions of humor like words like Ha Ha or Hee Hee Heee. > Come on April 1st. OK? > > > > 73, > Ron, K5HM > [email protected] > www.qrz.com/db/k5hm > <image001.jpg><image002.jpg><image003.jpg> > Excelsior! > > From: BVARC [mailto:[email protected] g] On Behalf Of Pat Cameron via > BVARC > Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 7:16 AM > To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]> > Cc: Pat Cameron <[email protected]>; Michael Monsour <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [BVARC] Trash on our Amateur Radio reflector > > Can we take a vote? > > Best Regards, > Pat Cameron > (832)885-2899 > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:08 AM, K5IZO via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael, I agree. > > Let's keep this reflector for ham radio so we don't have to receive this > garbage. Political views, sinkholes and April Fools trash isn't welcome here. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Apr 2, 2017, at 5:57 AM, Michael Monsour via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > If you are going to do April 1st stuff then have the FCC turn ham radio into > CB. No more calls and free for all and anything goes > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jeff Davis via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > I enjoyed it, I’ve been hit with so many today that it was getting old. Then > this one and man I swallowed it hook line and oh you know. > > it wasn’t till I went back to read it again and saw the date that I went, oh > crap, I fell for one. > > Thanks, > > KF5HQE Jeff > > On Apr 1, 2017, at 10:12 PM, gmuller885 via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just haveing fun michael. Don't take it so seriously. > > > > Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy® Note 4. > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Michael Monsour via BVARC <[email protected]> > Date: 4/1/17 9:42 PM (GMT-06:00) > To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]> > Cc: Michael Monsour <[email protected]>, JP Pritchard <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [BVARC] FCC action!! > > Enough with the April 1st junk > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 9:03 PM, JP Pritchard via BVARC <[email protected]> > wrote: > I know this is crap since the federal government would never say in a press > release that it had made a big mistake. Nice try Chris. You're an April fool. > > JP > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 1, 2017, at 8:45 PM, Chris Boone via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > FCC to reinstate Morse Code test > > > > Washington, D.C. – April 1, 2017 – > > > > Today, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission or FCC) approved > > Report and Order 14-987af which reinstates the Morse Code test for General > > Class and Amateur Extra Class licensees. > > > > “It was a big mistake eliminating the Morse Code test,” admits Dotty > > Dasher, the FCC’s director of examinations. “We now realize that being able > > to send and receive Morse Code is an essential skill for radio amateurs. As > > they say, it really does get through when other modes can’t.” > > > > Not only will new applicants have to take the test, but General Class > > licensees who have never passed a code test will have one year to pass a > > 5-wpm code test. Similarly, Amateur Extra class licensees that never passed > > a code test will have one year to pass a 13-wpm test. Those amateurs that > > fail to pass the test will face revocation of their operating privileges. > > Materials for administering the examinations will be distributed to > > Volunteer Examiner Coordinators by the end of April, so that they can begin > > the testing on May 1, 2017. > > > > “This isn’t going to be one of those silly multiple-choice type tests,” > > noted Dasher. “We’re going to be sending five-character random code groups, > > just like we did in the old days. And, applicants will have to prove that > > they can send, too, using a poorly adjusted straight key.” > > > > Technician Class licensees will not be required to take a Morse Code test, > > nor will a test be required for new applicants. “We discussed it,” said > > Dasher, “but decided that since most Techs can’t even figure out how to > > program their HTs, requiring them to learn Morse Code seemed like cruel and > > unusual punishment.” > > > > When asked what other actions we might see from the FCC, Dasher hinted that > > in the future applicants taking the written exam may be required to draw > > circuit diagrams, such as Colpitts oscillators and diode ring mixers, once > > again. “We’re beginning to think that if an applicant passes an amateur > > radio license exam it should mean that he or she actually knows something,” > > she said. > > ______________________________ __ > > Cumulus Media Disclaimer > > This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the > > individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee you should not > > disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender > > immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and > > delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient > > you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any > > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > > prohibited. > > ______________________________ _________________ > > BVARC mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailma n/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > ______________________________ _________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/ listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected] > > > <image002.jpg> > <image001.jpg> > <image003.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > BVARC mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org > Message delivered to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list [email protected] http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to [email protected]
