Actually, I have, and while I have seen a ton of hyperventilating, I would like a succinct answer to how or why the proposed bill would make things WORSE? Are you getting what you what from your HOA now? Does the bill make that situation better or worse?
I saw where someone attached a treatise from an “expert” in deed restrictions. I read down to where it said that under the bill an HOA “may” determine that a 440 whip is all a ham would ever need. I stopped reading at that point because an argument based on conjecture, which itself seemed to be based on anticipating the worst, didn’t seem like much of an argument. I will be the first to admit that I have NOT closely followed all of this. I live in a house where I can put up what I want. So I am perfectly happy for someone to point out to me that I don’t have a clue what I am talking about. I have no shame. That’s why I sent the email to the whole group! You may point out in embarrassing detail just how I have gotten it wrong. I just haven’t picked up on that by haphazardly reading through these messages, which have a very distinct Chicken Little aura about them. From my cursory read of all this traffic, I get the sense that there are people who think disaster is imminent, that ham radio is just about to be dead, and, the kicker, the ARRL is behind it all!! I just find that a tad difficult to buy….but again….I am sure I don’t know what I am talking about…. DAVID S. SIEGEL AJAMIE LLP 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150 | Houston TX 77002 T +1.713.860.1600 | F+ 1.713.860.1699 dsie...@ajamie.com<mailto:dsie...@ajamie.com> [cid:image003.jpg@01D311EF.A683FC80] website<http://ajamie.com/> | blog<http://ajamie.com/hot-issues/> | linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ajamie-llp> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. From: BVARC [mailto:bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org] On Behalf Of Paul Noll via BVARC Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:41 PM To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB Cc: Paul Noll Subject: Re: [BVARC] FW: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act Has no one been reading the posts on this ? On Aug 10, 2017 15:38, "David S.Siegel via BVARC" <bvarc@bvarc.org<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org>> wrote: Please explain how this new law would worsen the current situation? WD5BZN. DAVID S. SIEGEL AJAMIE LLP 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2150 | Houston TX 77002 T +1.713.860.1600<tel:(713)%20860-1600> | F+ 1.713.860.1699<tel:(713)%20860-1699> dsie...@ajamie.com<mailto:dsie...@ajamie.com> [cid:image004.jpg@01D311EF.A683FC80]website<http://ajamie.com/> | blog<http://ajamie.com/hot-issues/> | linkedin<https://www.linkedin.com/company/ajamie-llp> CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT This message is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. From: BVARC [mailto:bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org<mailto:bvarc-boun...@bvarc.org>] On Behalf Of Paul Noll via BVARC Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:24 PM To: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB Cc: Paul Noll Subject: Re: [BVARC] FW: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act Glad you are happy where you are at, but saying those that want a fair change to the law and some relief from HOA nonsense are "running to daddy" is just wrong ! Please don't degrade those of us who want fair change to an over reaching institution like HOA's. Remember, Hams do provide a public service. On Aug 10, 2017 14:45, "Glenn Anderson via BVARC" <bvarc@bvarc.org<mailto:bvarc@bvarc.org>> wrote: Finally someone with some common sense.... Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Amateur Radio Parity Act >>"FWIW, I DO consider this issue VITAL to anyone who lives in a restricted housing development, which includes a very high percentage of US hams. All of those US hams decided on their own to purchase property in the restricted area (myself included). I knew what it meant and I'm willing to 'man up' and abide by the agreement I signed at purchase to follow the rules. Running to 'daddy' after the fact and claiming it is VITAL that I be allowed to ignore the rules is not an appropriate reaction from my POV. If it is that vital don't purchase in such an area. Sometimes that can be difficult, but sometimes life is difficult. Mark AD5SS _______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to pbn...@gmail.com<mailto:pbn...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list BVARC@bvarc.org<mailto:BVARC@bvarc.org> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to pbn...@gmail.com<mailto:pbn...@gmail.com>
oledata.mso
Description: oledata.mso
_______________________________________________ BVARC mailing list BVARC@bvarc.org http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com
