Faster rates means wider transmission bandwidths, which means less room for
others on our HF bands.

73 de Bill, KG5FQX

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Jeff Greer via BVARC <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Noob question (I'm a new ham):
>
>
> Why do we not like the faster rates?  From the outside looking in, it
> seems like more lax rules would benefit us.  What am I missing?
>
>
> Jeff, W5JEF
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* BVARC <[email protected]> on behalf of Paul Noll via BVARC <
> [email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, October 6, 2017 8:01 AM
> *To:* BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB
> *Cc:* Paul Noll
> *Subject:* Re: [BVARC] [tdxs-list] FW: Let’s keep this "temporary" -
> beware of today's FCC Waiver - just announced
>
> There is no reason for concern now. FCC says temporary and I see no reason
> to think otherwise. If there is a problem after 60 days, let's deal with it
> then. Why worry over nothing now ?? Too many other things going on to worry
> about without adding more for no current reason.
>
> My 2 1/2 cents worth.
>
> Paul Noll
> KG5MHD
> Love your pets, they want and deserve it !!!
>
> On Oct 6, 2017, at 7:48 AM, n5xz via BVARC <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Still, hope it is only temporary
>
>
>
> Allen N5XZ
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Michael Smith <[email protected]>
> Date: 10/6/17 7:03 AM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Allen Brier N5XZ <[email protected]>
> Cc: BRAZOS VALLEY AMATEUR RADIO CLUB <[email protected]>, tdxs-list <
> [email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [tdxs-list] FW: Let’s keep this "temporary" - beware of
> today's FCC Waiver - just announced
>
> As one of the hams deployed to PR, I am very happy to see the waiver.
>
> N5TGL/KP4,
> Michael
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Allen Brier N5XZ <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> FYI
>>
>>
>>
>> de N5XZ:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The appropriate thing to do is monitor and *document* the interference
>> this activity will cause to other users/activity.
>>
>>
>>
>> ARRL will certainly argue to make the temporary order permanent based on
>> a "lack of interference", etc.  There must be countervailing evidence to
>> prevent the "end run".  ARRL, as a former administration, apparently
>> believes that a crisis is an opportunity to advance unpopular policies.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>
>>
>>    ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Ted Rappaport N9NB [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 05, 2017 8:48 PM
>> *To:* 'Jim Talens' <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* [email protected]; 'Don Greenbaum' <[email protected]>; 'Allen Brier
>> N5XZ' <[email protected]>; 'Sam Leslie - W4PK' <[email protected]>; 'Jeff
>> AC0C' <[email protected]>; 'Ron Kolarik' <[email protected]>;
>> [email protected]; 'Dan White' <[email protected]>; 'Richard Thorne' <
>> [email protected]>; 'Mark Sihlanick' <[email protected]>; 'Joe Subich,
>> W4TV' <[email protected]>; [email protected]; 'Jim McDonald' <
>> [email protected]>; 'Tom Morrison' <[email protected]>; 'Zoya Popovic' <
>> [email protected]>; 'Terry Gerdes Cell' <[email protected]>; 'Ed Muns' <
>> [email protected]>; [email protected]; 'Dick Hanson K5AND' <[email protected]>;
>> 'Scott Yost' <[email protected]>; 'Jim George' <
>> [email protected]>; 'Paul Stroud' <[email protected]>; 'Dick Hanson
>> K5AND' <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Lets keep this "temporary" - beware of today's FCC Waiver -
>> just announced
>>
>>
>>
>> We must do all we can to ensure this "temporary" order is only temporary-
>> 60 days----and let's hope it does some actual good for those suffering in
>> the Caribbean.
>>
>>
>>
>> Let us all beware of those at the league who have data ambitions that aim
>> to  push for FCC rules that would allow wideband encrypted modems like
>> Pactor 3 and 4 to overtake today's narrowband modes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please spread the word.
>>
>>
>>
>> And.........Beware.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 ted N9NB
>>
>> ----------
>>
>>
>>
>> From ARRL Newsletter:
>>
>>
>>
>> FCC Grants Temporary Waiver to Permit Higher Symbol Rate Data
>> Transmissions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The FCC has granted an ARRL request to waive current Amateur Radio rules
>> to permit data transmissions at a higher symbol rate than currently
>> permitted, in order to facilitate hurricane relief communications between
>> the continental US and Puerto Rico. The temporary waiver is limited to
>> Amateur Radio operators in Puerto Rico using PACTOR 3 and PACTOR 4
>> emissions, and to those radio amateurs in the continental US who are
>> directly involved with HF hurricane relief communications involving Puerto
>> Rico or the US Virgin Islands, the Commission said.
>>
>>
>>
>> "We conclude that granting the requested waiver is in the public
>> interest," the FCC said in its October 5 Order. "Hurricane Maria caused
>> massive destruction in Puerto Rico, and communication services continue to
>> be disrupted. Thus, to accommodate Amateur Radio operators assisting in the
>> recovery efforts, we grant the ARRL's waiver request for the period of 60
>> days from the date of this Order."
>>
>>
>>
>> ARRL explained in its waiver petition that it's shipping five PACTOR
>> radio modems to Puerto Rico for use in connection with Hurricane Maria
>> disaster relief communications. The League asked the FCC to temporarily
>> allow PACTOR 3 and PACTOR 4 transmissions that exceed the current symbol
>> rate limitations under § 97.307(f) of the Amateur Service rules.
>>
>>
>>
>> Under the current rules, "specified digital codes" in Part 97 may be used
>> with a symbol rate that does not exceed 300 baud for frequencies below 28
>> MHz, with the exception of 60 meters, and 1200 baud in the 10 meter band.
>> The baud rate limits were adopted in 1980, when the FCC amended Part 97 to
>> specify ASCII as a permissible digital code.
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>> https://lists.tdxs.net/mailman/options/tdxs-list/radion5tgl%40gmail.com
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Message delivered to [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BVARC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
> Message delivered to [email protected]
>
>
_______________________________________________
BVARC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.bvarc.org/mailman/listinfo/bvarc_bvarc.org
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to