Hey Jay On 15/03/2008, Jay Berkenbilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The one thing I think would probably be a casualty would be > xerces-p (XML::Xerces perl), but I don't think very many people are > using that, and it doesn't seem to be actively maintained. (Correct > me if I'm wrong.) >
I was curious why xerces-p would be a casualty? The primary struggle I've had as xerces-p maintainer was xerces-c's alternate build system. Now that it fully supports the GNU toolchain, xerces-p is bundled with xerces-c as a subproject. Shouldn't that make it easier for debian? I don't think there are many active users of xerces-p, so if it was dropped out of debian, those that wanted it could get it from CPAN. Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
