On 18 Mar 2008, at 07:37, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
Hi Gareth,
Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I think it will be much easier to maintain now it is part of xerces.
Its not actually hard to change the SWIG files if you know you have
broken them.
Well, I don't know anything about swig so I wouldn't know when I broke
it and how to fix it. I also don't see a reason why Xerces-C++
maintainers who are otherwise not interested in perl binding and/or
swig have to learn about this stuff. To me this idea sounds like
another hurdle one has to overcome when developing and maintaining
the project. It makes even less sense when we consider that nobody
seems to be interested in this feature (see Jason's earlier email
as well as the Debian popularity contest results).
Well, there are many parts of Xerces that I may not be interested in
and yet I still fix the build if I break them. The question for me is
are users interested. If they are not then there is not even any need
to worry about whether we have a maintainer.
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, CTO WE7
+44-20-7117-0809 http://www.we7.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
