"Jason Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was curious why xerces-p would be a casualty? The primary struggle > I've had as xerces-p maintainer was xerces-c's alternate build system. > Now that it fully supports the GNU toolchain, xerces-p is bundled with > xerces-c as a subproject. Shouldn't that make it easier for debian?
Oh, I didn't realize it was bundled with xerces-c now, or has it been? In that case, there should be no problem. (looking at the distribution) Hmm. I don't see it. Am I missing something? Where can I get a xerces-p that will work with 3.0.0? > I don't think there are many active users of xerces-p, so if it was > dropped out of debian, those that wanted it could get it from CPAN. True enough. Anyway, I'll keep it in if I can. I just didn't realize there was a version that worked with > 2.7.0. My source of information is the Xerces P link on xerces.apache.org. I also see that 2.7.0 is the latest version on CPAN. For what it's worth, I made a quick attempt to package XML::Xerces 2.7.0 with 2.8.0, and the configuration complained that the versions didn't match. I didn't make any attempts to override it. --Jay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
