On 18 Mar 2008, at 00:15, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
As Jason mentioned in one of his emails, he asked a number of
scripting
language communities whether they would be interested in Xerces-C++
binding. Apparently nobody was interested.
My position boils down to the following: if we cannot find a permanent
maintainer for swig then we should move it to attic (new SVN module
for unused code). Releasing 3.0.0 with swig but without permanent
maintainer would give a false impression to the users that this
functionality will be maintained and supported in the future. If,
at some point, we find someone interested in maintaining swig we
can always move it back to the trunk.
I think it will be much easier to maintain now it is part of xerces.
Its not actually hard to change the SWIG files if you know you have
broken them.
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, CTO WE7
+44-20-7117-0809 http://www.we7.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
