Hey Alberto, On 22/03/2008, Alberto Massari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we can remove this dependency on configure and autoconf, it would be > possible for Xerces to work regardless of the presence of the swig > subdir. Ah... Now I see the issue... if we remove the swig directory from the distribution, then autoconf will fail? I didn't realize that. Is there a way to make the Makefiles in the swig dir optional? Otherwise I think it is best to remove all knowledge of the swig dir from the top-level files. > The perl binding would then be built either manually (cd swig; > perl Makefile.PL; make -C perl test) or from the Xerces directory (make > test-suite). The code in swig/util/ is a library that depends on libxerces and the header files, that's all. We just need a simple Makefile to compile it - I added it into the autoconf files because they existed and it took advantage of all the work already done by Xerces. Maybe if we have a seperate distribution for Xerces-P, it can include different top-level configure.ac and Makefile.am that includes the swig/ dir? Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
