I have some projects to look at, if interested

--- On Tue, 1/27/09, Tyler Littlefield <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Tyler Littlefield <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [c-prog] virus
To: [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2009, 9:55 AM










    
            ooo. I'd be glad to see the list of productive projects. :)



----- Original Message ----- 

  From: Thomas Hruska 

  To: c-p...@yahoogroups. com 

  Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 6:13 AM

  Subject: Re: [c-prog] virus



Prince Annan Koomson wrote:

  > I think writing virus is something simple but depending on the nature of 
the virus you wanted to produce but all software developers have some code of 
ethics to fellow you cant just write virus just like that, every computer 
science student or developer can write or produce one, let me show you some 
trick...

  > just google and you will get some c source code okay...



Authoring a virus means you have personal ethical and time management 

  issues that you need to address: You want to make someone else's life 

  miserable. That alone should stop everyone from authoring them. 

  Viruses are destructive, invasive, and a complete waste of everyone's 

  time. Anti-virus software is equally invasive, significantly slowing 

  down all critical computer operations and causes all sorts of problems 

  worse than most viruses. IMO, the AV vendors are just as bad as the 

  virus authors. They want OS vendors to leave security holes open in the 

  OS just for them so they can keep making and selling their software.



If anyone here has the time to author a virus, I've got 300 _productive_ 

  projects for you to work on that will keep you busy for the rest of your 

  life...and then some.



Just because you CAN do something does not mean you should.



-- 

  Thomas Hruska

  CubicleSoft President

  Ph: 517-803-4197



*NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1

  Get on task. Stay on task.



http://www.CubicleS oft.com/MyTaskFo cus/



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to