--- In [email protected], Thomas Hruska <thru...@...> wrote:
>
> Tyler Littlefield wrote:
> > har har, funny. :)
> > 
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: Thomas Hruska 
> >   To: [email protected] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 5:37 PM
> >   Subject: Re: [c-prog] virus
> > 
> > 
> >   Tyler Littlefield wrote:
> >   > ooo. I'd be glad to see the list of productive projects. :)
> > 
> >   Here's one: Go make a lightweight, high performance, complete, open 
> >   source (very liberal license) VC++ C/C++ library.
> > 
> >   The current VC++ library "requires" Fusion. Which is a complete
lie. 
> >   And it is clear that Microsoft intends the next version of VC++
will 
> >   likely only support Vista and later. Most likely they will 
> >   intentionally drag in a completely unnecessary API. There is no
need 
> >   for an ANSI Standard C/C++ library to be 1MB+ and not support
everything 
> >   back to Windows 95.
> > 
> >   Support all linking modes too. Make it easy to integrate into
Visual 
> >   Studio.
> > 
> >   I know a zillion people who hate the VC++ Runtimes.
> > 
> >   That will keep you busy for the next couple years. Have fun!
> 
> Actually, I was quite serious.  Having an alternative to the Microsoft 
> Runtimes would be great - especially for those who are harassed daily 
> about the latest Runtimes and those who have to use VC6 because VC6's 
> Runtimes are (currently) installed on all versions of Windows.
> 
> 
> But since you didn't like that project, here's another one:  Add a 
> wxWidgets form designer to VC++ so developers can design wxWidgets 
> dialogs, etc. all from within the VC++ IDE.  (What I want to know is
how 
> in the world Borland C++ has a wxWidgets form designer and VC++
doesn't? 
>   Borland has zero market share...)
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Hruska
> CubicleSoft President
> Ph: 517-803-4197
> 
> *NEW* MyTaskFocus 1.1
> Get on task.  Stay on task.
> 
> http://www.CubicleSoft.com/MyTaskFocus/
>
I profoundly concur with your post.  In sooth, the only concerns of
the Virus software suppliers and Microsoft is the almighty buck!  Why
else does Microsoft implement PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE?  For some time
now, I've had legal copies of Office '95 and '97.  But they have
become more and more constrained in their operation on Window XP.  I
doubt that they are even installable on Vista and I expect Windows 7
will cause the CD's to explode and burn.  Your challenges are
excellent.  Thank you.

Kocmotex

Reply via email to