Hi, On 11 July 2016 at 06:37, Edward Z. Yang <ezy...@mit.edu> wrote: > If you hate it I can change it back but give it a try for now. > If the "component" prefix in "component: solver" is too long we could go for > something like "C-solver" but I think that is less transparent.
Thanks, looks much better than the previous version. Re: the "specification" tag, I think it's supposed to mark proposed changes to the .cabal file format and GHC/Cabal interaction (i.e. the Cabal spec). _______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list email@example.com http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel