Looks good indeed! I have few questions: - what is purpose of `paging:*` labels, to help people see issues they are interested in? How it’s different from assignees (which can be multiple)? - why “bug” has “ezyang planning to delete this tag”. I’d prefer to have “type: bug” and other “type:*” labels as: “type: discuss”, “type: enhancement”, “type: question”, and maybe more as e.g. stack has https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/labels <https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stack/labels> - how priority labels interact with milestones? - Should we add “pr welcome” or “awaiting pr” for issues which are discussed, but nobody have interest or time implementing right away (will help new contributors especially when combined with `meta: easy`)
- Oleg > On 11 Jul 2016, at 08:09, Mikhail Glushenkov <mikhail.glushen...@gmail.com > <mailto:mikhail.glushen...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 11 July 2016 at 06:37, Edward Z. Yang <ezy...@mit.edu > <mailto:ezy...@mit.edu>> wrote: >> If you hate it I can change it back but give it a try for now. >> If the "component" prefix in "component: solver" is too long we could go for >> something like "C-solver" but I think that is less transparent. > > Thanks, looks much better than the previous version. > > Re: the "specification" tag, I think it's supposed to mark proposed > changes to the .cabal file format and GHC/Cabal interaction (i.e. the > Cabal spec). > _______________________________________________ > cabal-devel mailing list > cabal-devel@haskell.org <mailto:cabal-devel@haskell.org> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cabal-devel mailing list cabal-devel@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cabal-devel
