Ethan Quach wrote: > > > Ethan Quach wrote: >> Dave Miner wrote: >> >>> usr/src/cmd/beadm/Makefile: >>> >>> 53-54: Seems like we could add a suffix rule for .py to >>> Makefile.master as a cleaner and more general answer; that should >>> allow for using the standard PROG and its derived definitions rather >>> than the >>> >> >> I think ideally we should compile the .py file as well (and perhaps >> deliver the .pyc with our package? I don't know that much about python >> so I'm not really sure if we should or not.) >> >> I'll look at adding the rule with the Makefile.master, that part doesn't >> look too hard. > > This turned out to be more of a pain than I thought, especially if we're > looking to > define compiling the python modules as part of the rule. If you don't > mind, I'd like > to defer this part, but I'll add compiling the python in our > beadm/Makefile, and > look into delivering the .pyc files in our package. >
That'll be OK. Dave
