On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:34:20AM -0700, Ethan Quach wrote: > One thing I'm noticing on a current Solaris x86 box is that there seems > to be a > couple other conventions. Given a /usr/lib/libfoo.so.1, there are a > couple cases > of /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/foo.so or > /usr/lib/python2.4/vendor-packages/libfoomod.so
Well spotted. Note that the libfoomod.so variants are all written by the same person, and they all have .py files in the same directory. So I don't think this applies here. Without the 'lib' part you'd have 'be.so', which seems a little too generic, so 'libbe.so' is the naming that makes most sense to me. I'm open to differing opinions... regards, john
