Thank you - I will read it later today.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Schumann [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 10 March 2011 13:53
> To: Robert Milkowski
> Cc: 'caiman-discuss'
> Subject: Re: [caiman-discuss] Code review request: profile enhancements
> for automated installer
> 
> Robert,
> The design document is here:
> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/download/Project+caiman/System+Configur
> ation+Project/SCProfileProposal.odt
> William
> 
> On 03/ 9/11 12:37 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
> > Is the new design doc publicly available somewhere?
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:caiman-discuss-
> >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of William Schumann
> >> Sent: 03 March 2011 17:14
> >> To: Dave Miner
> >> Cc: caiman-discuss
> >> Subject: Re: [caiman-discuss] Code review request: profile
> >> enhancements for automated installer
> >>
> >> Dave,
> >> Please find responses inline.  Took your suggestions unless otherwise
> > noted.
> >> current webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/profile4/
> >> differences with last webrev
> > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/profile3-diff/
> >> On 02/21/11 05:46 PM, Dave Miner wrote:
> >>> On 02/16/11 10:43 AM, William Schumann wrote:
> >>>> To reviewers, thank you.
> >>>> I have integrated some significant changes in two recent changesets:
> >>>> - webserver design changes
> >>>> - 7015429 Convert installadm.c to python
> >>>>
> >>>> For the webserver changes:
> >>>> I moved code formerly in my now defunct locate_profile.py to
> >>>> cgi_get_manifest.py Modified ai_get_manifest.py to get:
> >>>> - manifest
> >>>> - any profiles
> >>>> - any logging messages from the CGI that might be informative to
> >>>> the AI client user on the console
> >>>>
> >>>> Anyone familiar with webserver design changes, please check the
> >>>> above
> >> modules for any incorrect assumptions.
> >>>> I've not received any feedback on pyunit tests.
> >>>>
> >>>> current webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/profile3/
> >>>> differences with last webrev
> >>>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/profile2-diff/
> >>>> last webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~wmsch/profile2/
> >>>>
> >>> ai-webserver/Makefile, 87: had we previously discussed adding
> >>> hostname
> >> here?
> >> hostname has been in the design document since the early revisions.
> >> It
> > was
> >> missing from the Makefile due to an oversight.
> >>> I'm concerned about diverging possible criteria between manifests
> >>> and
> >> profiles.
> >> CR 7006611 addresses adding hostname for manifests, so this much has
> >> been decided.  I'd suggest addressing manifests separately, since I
> >> don't see
> > any
> >> bugs here and the CR should be a fairly simple fix.
> >>>
> >>> cgi_get_manifest.py
> >>>
> >>> 327: under what conditions do we run into a situation with criteria
> > missing?
> >> Does it happen when we're serving older clients?
> >>> Just want to understand if we're going to be generating a lot of
> >>> noise
> > here
> >> or not.
> >> At the moment, it shouldn't happen at all.  I can see it happening in
> >> the future if new criteria is added - the old client sends the new
> >> server
> > different
> >> criteria.  However, in this instance, the protocol version added by
> >> John
> > would
> >> indicate the old protocol version and the CGI would log accordingly.
> >>> 434: Why return this message to the client?  There's nothing it can
> >>> do about it and really doesn't affect the validity of the profile
> >>> from the
> > client's
> >> point of view.
> >> Perhaps it is sufficient for the message to be sent only for 'validate'
> > and
> >> 'create-profile' subcommands.  Removing this logging entirely from
> >> client/server.
> >>> export_profile.py, 120: s/delete/export/
> >>>
> >>> ai_get_manifest.py, 49: now that we have build 159, /system/volatile
> >>> would be preferred.  I presume we're going to let the upcoming
> >>> AI->CUD
> >> relocate the manifest.xml our of /tmp?
> >> That sounds like a more efficient approach.  I'm working with the CUD
> >> engineers so that this will be done correctly.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> William
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> caiman-discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

_______________________________________________
caiman-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss

Reply via email to