We've not documented plugins and made no commitments to the plugin arch. This isn't a breaking change. Its an evolutionary change. Plugins will break, and those are not officially, nor ever where, supported.
Some docs in the wiki will suffice; keeping release cadence way more important for my vote. We need to shore up the plugin arch before we talk about supporting it. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I'm a little worried that every plugin is broken on Android. Not > only broken but will require a completely different approach than > iOS/BB for the .js side. I've put together a patch for Android that > puts back much of the old way of doing a plugin except for the name > change to cordova. It makes sense to break all the plugins at once in > a future release. > > Bryce will update once he gets a chance to take a look at it as I'm > out of here this afternoon. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable apache >> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get 1.5 out >> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as a non >> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an apache >> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors and be >> ready for 1.6. >> >> Cheers, >> -Steve >> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in the >>> apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work out. >>> >>> I will take another read through that. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now. >>> >> >>> > >>> > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume. >>> > >>> > >>> >> Please review them before we move them and make them public. >>> >> >>> >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to Apache. I >>> have a >>> >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted to make >>> this >>> >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need? >>> >> >>> > >>> > Have you read >>> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet? >>> > >>> > I've just started, for weinre. >>> > >>> > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have >>> > "incubating" in the name. I noticed a whole bunch of issues when reading >>> > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki for >>> > things I needed to 'fix'. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Patrick Mueller >>> > http://muellerware.org >>>
