OK, we should talk about deleting and recommitting tags. I'm OK with it if it's to fix my screw-up, but when its a fundamental bug, I think we should issue a new release, like a 1.5.1.
As for the Apache release, we don't have headers on docs yet. We need headers before we can be Apache. Please correct me and clean the JIRA if I am wrong. Joe On Mar 5, 2012 12:20 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey all, > > I added a couple of methods (addConstructor, addPlugin) into the > common-js code and created a variable PhoneGap that points to cordova. > This way all existing plugins that work on Android should be able to > work without changes to their JS. > > I deleted the current 1.5.0 tag and retagged with my latest commit > being the head. > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a=commit;h=8923e52a5ed5e9ea4c3c5f7ed49400cac668a4d6 > > If Steve wants to re-generate the release with that tag it would be > for the best. > > Simon Mac Donald > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > There is a critical bug with maintaining compatibility for non-core > plugins > > for Android that we have a fix for. Simon will be dropping it today, and > > I'd like to get that in to release 1.5. IMHO compatibility makes sense > to > > maintain until all platforms migrate to cordova-js. > > > > Regarding 1.5.0 as an Apache release. Do we know how close we are? If > > it's only a few days - then I would vote for finishing those items that > are > > holding up an official release. I really want 1.6.0 to be a robust > > official release, so would have more confidence if we can get 1.5.0 > > official. What is the list of items required to be official? > > > > Thanks, > > Bryce > > > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hey Guys, > >> > >> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable apache > >> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get 1.5 > out > >> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as a > non > >> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an apache > >> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors and > be > >> ready for 1.6. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -Steve > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in the > >> > apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work out. > >> > > >> > I will take another read through that. > >> > > >> > -Steve > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> Please review them before we move them and make them public. > >> > >> > >> > >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to Apache. > I > >> > have a > >> > >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted to > make > >> > this > >> > >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need? > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > Have you read > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet? > >> > > > >> > > I've just started, for weinre. > >> > > > >> > > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have > >> > > "incubating" in the name. I noticed a whole bunch of issues when > >> reading > >> > > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki > for > >> > > things I needed to 'fix'. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Patrick Mueller > >> > > http://muellerware.org > >> > > >> >
