OK, I'll file a JIRA issue and we'll slate removing the `plugins` and `PhoneGap` globals for 1.6 then!
On 3/5/12 2:39 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >I agree with all of your points. I just think that it doesn't make >sense to break plugins for Android only in 1.5.0. Let's get everyone >using common JS for 1.6.0 then break plugins for everyone :) > >Simon Mac Donald >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > >On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> The "plugins" global makes me cringe - adding "PhoneGap" for >>compatibility >> makes sense but I'd like to see us plan to phase that out in the next >>few >> point releases. Accompany with a couple blog posts / guides on upgrading >> and what is changing and we should be good. >> >> On 3/5/12 12:19 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Hey all, >>> >>>I added a couple of methods (addConstructor, addPlugin) into the >>>common-js code and created a variable PhoneGap that points to cordova. >>>This way all existing plugins that work on Android should be able to >>>work without changes to their JS. >>> >>>I deleted the current 1.5.0 tag and retagged with my latest commit >>>being the head. >>> >>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git; >>>a= >>>commit;h=8923e52a5ed5e9ea4c3c5f7ed49400cac668a4d6 >>> >>>If Steve wants to re-generate the release with that tag it would be >>>for the best. >>> >>>Simon Mac Donald >>>http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >>> >>> >>> >>>On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>>> There is a critical bug with maintaining compatibility for non-core >>>>plugins >>>> for Android that we have a fix for. Simon will be dropping it today, >>>>and >>>> I'd like to get that in to release 1.5. IMHO compatibility makes >>>>sense >>>>to >>>> maintain until all platforms migrate to cordova-js. >>>> >>>> Regarding 1.5.0 as an Apache release. Do we know how close we are? >>>>If >>>> it's only a few days - then I would vote for finishing those items >>>>that >>>>are >>>> holding up an official release. I really want 1.6.0 to be a robust >>>> official release, so would have more confidence if we can get 1.5.0 >>>> official. What is the list of items required to be official? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Bryce >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>>>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable >>>>>apache >>>>> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get >>>>>1.5 >>>>>out >>>>> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as >>>>>a non >>>>> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an >>>>>apache >>>>> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors >>>>>and be >>>>> ready for 1.6. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -Steve >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in >>>>>the >>>>> > apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work >>>>>out. >>>>> > >>>>> > I will take another read through that. >>>>> > >>>>> > -Steve >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> >>>>>wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill >>>>><stevengil...@gmail.com> >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >> Please review them before we move them and make them public. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to >>>>>Apache. I >>>>> > have a >>>>> > >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted >>>>>to >>>>>make >>>>> > this >>>>> > >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need? >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Have you read >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > I've just started, for weinre. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have >>>>> > > "incubating" in the name. I noticed a whole bunch of issues when >>>>> reading >>>>> > > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki >>>>>for >>>>> > > things I needed to 'fix'. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > Patrick Mueller >>>>> > > http://muellerware.org >>>>> > >>>>> >>