The "plugins" global makes me cringe - adding "PhoneGap" for compatibility makes sense but I'd like to see us plan to phase that out in the next few point releases. Accompany with a couple blog posts / guides on upgrading and what is changing and we should be good.
On 3/5/12 12:19 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hey all, > >I added a couple of methods (addConstructor, addPlugin) into the >common-js code and created a variable PhoneGap that points to cordova. >This way all existing plugins that work on Android should be able to >work without changes to their JS. > >I deleted the current 1.5.0 tag and retagged with my latest commit >being the head. > >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cordova-android.git;a= >commit;h=8923e52a5ed5e9ea4c3c5f7ed49400cac668a4d6 > >If Steve wants to re-generate the release with that tag it would be >for the best. > >Simon Mac Donald >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > >On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Bryce Curtis <curtis.br...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> There is a critical bug with maintaining compatibility for non-core >>plugins >> for Android that we have a fix for. Simon will be dropping it today, >>and >> I'd like to get that in to release 1.5. IMHO compatibility makes sense >>to >> maintain until all platforms migrate to cordova-js. >> >> Regarding 1.5.0 as an Apache release. Do we know how close we are? If >> it's only a few days - then I would vote for finishing those items that >>are >> holding up an official release. I really want 1.6.0 to be a robust >> official release, so would have more confidence if we can get 1.5.0 >> official. What is the list of items required to be official? >> >> Thanks, >> Bryce >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >>> Hey Guys, >>> >>> I haven't got much input about if this release is an acceptable apache >>> release. I figure this will take some time still and we should get 1.5 >>>out >>> today. If there are no objections, I am going to release 1.5 today as >>>a non >>> apache release (our usual method) and say we aim for 1.6 to be an >>>apache >>> release. This will give us more time to review 1.5 with our mentors >>>and be >>> ready for 1.6. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -Steve >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Steve Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> >>> > Drop box is only for use between the list. I'm hoping to get it in >>>the >>> > apache servers for distribution, or github if that doesn't work out. >>> > >>> > I will take another read through that. >>> > >>> > -Steve >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mar 3, 2012, at 6:46 PM, Patrick Mueller <pmue...@gmail.com> >>>wrote: >>> > >>> > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 19:05, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> I have placed these files on my dropbox for now. >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > We'll have to find something better than Dropbox, I assume. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> Please review them before we move them and make them public. >>> > >> >>> > >> Jukka, let us know if these files are correct according to >>>Apache. I >>> > have a >>> > >> KEYS file in the zip that contains my public key. If we wanted to >>>make >>> > this >>> > >> the first Apache release, what other changes would we need? >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Have you read >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.htmlyet? >>> > > >>> > > I've just started, for weinre. >>> > > >>> > > So, one obvious thing is that the distribution files need to have >>> > > "incubating" in the name. I noticed a whole bunch of issues when >>> reading >>> > > the file, was going to create a check-list for weinre on the wiki >>>for >>> > > things I needed to 'fix'. >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Patrick Mueller >>> > > http://muellerware.org >>> > >>>
