Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing? On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote:
>This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this: > >1) tag 1.7.0 >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs >3) tag 1.7.1 >4) crap one more bug >5) tag 1.7.2 >6) phew, regression passed >7) Release 1.7.2! > >What do you think? > >Simon Mac Donald >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1. >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> > > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> > > > >> > > >> From: [email protected] >> > > >> To: [email protected] >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700 >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1? >> > > >> >> > > >> Let's tag it! >> > > >> >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> >Hey >> > > >> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag >> 1.7.0rc1 >> > > >>this >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before >> moving >> > > >>on to >> > > >> >1.8. >> > > >> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we >>just >> > > >> >increment >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of >> > confusion. >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Joe >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >>
