I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is whether we did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a bit more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0 releases.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing? > > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like this: > > > >1) tag 1.7.0 > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs > >3) tag 1.7.1 > >4) crap one more bug > >5) tag 1.7.2 > >6) phew, regression passed > >7) Release 1.7.2! > > > >What do you think? > > > >Simon Mac Donald > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > > > > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1 > >> > > > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 > >> > > > > >> > > >> From: [email protected] > >> > > >> To: [email protected] > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700 > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1? > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Let's tag it! > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Hey > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably tag > >> 1.7.0rc1 > >> > > >>this > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in before > >> moving > >> > > >>on to > >> > > >> >1.8. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can we > >>just > >> > > >> >increment > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot of > >> > confusion. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Joe > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >
