Blackberry tagged! Sorry on the lateness on that one On 4/23/12 12:04 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> wrote:
>kk, just throwing it out there for discussion. Seems like folks would >rather keep the "rc" tagging for now. > >Simon Mac Donald >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think the only difference between an rc and a patch release is >>whether we >> did it before or after the end of the month. I think this does make a >>bit >> more sense, since you can tell people to expect bugs in the x.x.0 >> releases. >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Other than the labels for the tags isn't that what we're doing? >> > >> > On 4/23/12 11:57 AM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >This may be the wrong thread but can we just start versioning like >>this: >> > > >> > >1) tag 1.7.0 >> > >2) dammit found a bunch of regression bugs >> > >3) tag 1.7.1 >> > >4) crap one more bug >> > >5) tag 1.7.2 >> > >6) phew, regression passed >> > >7) Release 1.7.2! >> > > >> > >What do you think? >> > > >> > >Simon Mac Donald >> > >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> > > >> > > >> > >On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Bada 1.2 has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> > >> >> > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Android has been tagged 1.7.0rc1. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > JS tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "Herm Wong" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >webos has been tagged 1.7.0rc1 >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> From: [email protected] >> > >> > > >> To: [email protected] >> > >> > > >> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:56 -0700 >> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Tag 1.7.0rc1? >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> Let's tag it! >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> On 4/20/12 10:55 AM, "Joe Bowser" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >Hey >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >I know that we just tagged 1.6.1, but we should probably >>tag >> > >> 1.7.0rc1 >> > >> > > >>this >> > >> > > >> >week so we can get a week of testing, bugfixes, etc in >>before >> > >> moving >> > >> > > >>on to >> > >> > > >> >1.8. >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >BTW: Once we're done whatever we need to do with 2.0, can >>we >> > >>just >> > >> > > >> >increment >> > >> > > >> >by numbers if we're going by cadence? It'd clear up a lot >>of >> > >> > confusion. >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> >Joe >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >>
