Meg,

This seems right to me as well. We've had 
dancing at jams or caller sessions and there's a lot of waiting (or 
inventive scrambling end to end) with six couples or less for a typical contra 
line. We've done it with laughter and good cheer, but I wouldn't prefer less 
than 7 couples for a "formal" dance contra line.  I'm glad you mentioned the 
alternate formations, triplets, scatter mixers & other proper configurations, 
are important for any caller collection.

Laurie P
MI

---
 On Wed, 5/12/10, Paul Wilde <[email protected]> 
wrote:

From: Paul Wilde 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Callers] Dance length
To:
 "Caller's discussion list" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: 
Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 10:09 PM

Meg,

My
 personal opinion is that 7 couples is a good minimum number for a 
contra
line.  This gives 3 sets of hands 4 dancing all the time.  6 
couples will
leave you with 2 hands 4 and 2 couples out every other
 progression.

Good luck,
Paul Wilde

--- On Wed, 5/12/10, Meg Dedolph <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Meg Dedolph <[email protected]>
Subject: [Callers] Dance length
To: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, May 12, 2010, 9:02 PM

Hi everyone,
I have a question about dance length - not the length of time you run a 
particular dance, but the length of an evening of dancing. In Chicago, we 
recently went from a three-hour Monday night dance to a two-and-a-half hour 
Monday night dance. Some dancers like ending earlier, some really hate it and 
others don't seem to care.
>From a caller's perspective, will you generally keep calling contras when 
>there are three or four couples left? I know one can always call squares or 
>triplets, or ask the band to play waltzes, but I'm specifically curious about 
>contras. Do people think there's a minimum number of dancers necessary for a 
>contra line? I've danced in four-couple contra lines, and I don't think it's a 
>whole lot of fun. And I've been the caller at 10:45 p.m. trying to call a 
>square dance, which I'm not good at yet, and I don't think that's a lot of fun 
>either.
Thanks for any input you all have....
Meg


      
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers




Reply via email to