On Tue, Jun 02, 2015, Maia McCormick via Callers wrote: > > I think Ron's point is that with this set of terms (i.e. 1st/2nd corner > refers to the person rather than the position), if we're in an improper > context, we've basically circled back around to labeling the roles, only > these role labels seem unideal because they have lots of syllables and > sound relatively similar. At the point at which we're talking about "first > corner" and "second corner", isn't it less of a mouthful, easier to > understand, and easier for experienced dancers to convert into terms they > understand to have a set of terms like jets[gems]/rubies or larks/ravens?
Also, if people really want contextless terms, I reiterate my suggestion: PURPLE! GREEN! PURPLE! GREEN! -- Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://rule6.info/ <*> <*> <*> "Whenever Dan Savage and Miss Manners agree, take their advice!" --Sigrid Ellis
