On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:34:30 +0200 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it seems someone doesn't like us at wikipedia. the wikipedia > > article was deleted hours after it was written because of referring > > to 'non-notable software'. what is there to do about this? > > The article isn't deleted. That part was stopped, but it looks like > someone doesn't want us to get any attention, whoever that might > be....... What I beleive would be good about this is a new rc, since > rc4 really isn't any good, and a timeplan for a release, combined > with a timeplan for a release so we could get some press coverage. > Some have spoken against hurry releases as oppsosed to stabilisation, > and although I tend to agree, a release is important for this project > to gain members and developers. > > All comments welcomed Well, actually being new on the list I did not want to start with a complaint that the rc presented on the main project page does not work. But as you already mentioned it, me too thinks that it should be replaced by something that at least compiles well. To a certain extent I believe this should be possible for daily snapshots, too. Or at least there should be a way to find the latest compilable snapshot, however that may be called. The "market share" will grow faster if the project works better in fields where asterisk was somehow "taken over" by company interests and merely no steps forward are seen. This is namely ISDN and PSTN setups where hw producers try to gain shares by denying features for other hw or producing weird patches. -- Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ Callweaver-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
