HOR NAM HONG , A VIETNAMESE ,APPOINTED by King Sihamoni,  AS FOREIGN MINISTER 
OF CAMBODIA TO NEGOTIATE AND TALK ON BEHALF OF THE KHMER PEOPLE HERE. 
 
       this woman , the Deputy Prime Ministers Men Sam An(A VIETNAMESE ), Nhek 
Bun Chhay and Keat Chhon. 
Ms Chea Leang seen here on this picture ,the so called "CAMBODIAN" 
CO-PROSECUTOR, is a Vietnamese woman 

Phnom Penh (Cambodia) 20 November 2006. Co-prosecutors Robert Petit talked to 
Chea Leang(a Vietnamese posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor) during the plenary 
session of judges for the KR Tribunal (Photo: John Vink/Magnum)
 
Tribunal Prosecutors Differ on Added Suspects



Chea Leang(a Vietnamese posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor)Tribunal judges 
will determine whether more suspects should be investigated.
 
This man ,KHIEU KANHARITH, a fake "Cambodian " name is a Vietnamese , appointed 
as "Cambdoian" Minister of Information by King Sihanouk and son King Sihamoni.  


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE KHMER MONARCHS COLLABORATION WITH THE VIETNAMESE INVADERS HAVE THESE 
CONSEQUENCES.THE KHMER MONARCHS IGNORES THE 10 UN RESOLUTIONS AND THE US 
PRESIDENT CALL TO VIETNAM TO CEASE HER OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA.

President Reagan's address to the 43d Session of the United Nations General 
Assembly in New York, New York . September 26, 1988. "Mr. Secretary-General, 
there are new hopes for Cambodia, a nation whose freedom and independence we 
seek just as avidly as we sought the freedom and independence of Afghanistan. 
We urge the rapid removal of all Vietnamese troops ...."
 
 

LOOK TO THIS LABEL ?
A CAMBODIAN POLICE  means  A VIETNAMESE HEREA VIETNAMESE RUNNING THE POLICE IN 
CAMBODIA with a fake name Choun Narin  .LOOK TO THE LABEL : a Vietnamese with a 
fake Cambodian name : Choun narin .? 
HOW KING SIHAMONI  INFLICTS PERMANENT SUFFERINGS TO THE CAMBODIAN POEPLE? WHILE 
CAMBODIA REMAINS OCCUPIED BY VIETNAM, AGAINST 10 UN RESOLUTIONS, BECAUSE KING 
NORODOM SIHAMONI CONTINUES TO APPOINT THE VIETNAMESE INVADERS TO RUN THE 
COUNTRY WITH HIM IN VIOLATION OF THE UN CHARTER , AGAINST THE WILL AND 
ASPIRATIONS OF ALL KHMER AND THE KHMER PEOPLE FROM 1979-2009. 
HOK LUNDI AS HEAD OF POLICE ,IS A VIETNAMESE (died recently).
HOR NAM HONG , AS MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS ,IS A VIETNAMESE.

a VIETNAMESE ,Hor Namhong said :  



 Cambodia’s Deputy PM and Foreign Minister, December.
 
 
 
 
  

 
  
 
 

Cambodia tribunal dispute runs deeper 


Who will prevail: Justice or the Strongman?
HUN SEN IS USING Ms Chea Leang seen here on this picture ,the so called 
"CAMBODIAN" CO-PROSECUTOR, is a Vietnamese woman 


Phnom Penh (Cambodia) 20 November 2006. Co-prosecutors Robert Petit talked to 
Chea Leang(a Vietnamese posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor) during the plenary 
session of judges for the KR Tribunal (Photo: John Vink/Magnum)
 
Tribunal Prosecutors Differ on Added Suspects



Chea Leang(a Vietnamese posing as "Cambodian" co-prosecutor)Tribunal judges 
will determine whether more suspects should be investigated.
 
UNDER THE POL POT ERA( 1975-1979) , THIS  VIETNAMESE POSED AS KHMER ROUGE 
CADRE( FROM THE FUNK TROOPS OF SIHANOUK) , SUCH AS DUCH,HOR NAM HONG AND OTHERS 
WHO KILLED A BRITISH CALDWELD .
 
 








 

 


















Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch, was arrested in 1999. According to the Morphology 
study on race and forensic data nalysis ,Kaing Kek Iev, aka Duch is A 
VIETNAMESE.
CONSEQUENCES OF THE KHMER KING COLLABORATION WITH THE VIETNAMESE INVADERS, 
ILLEGAL VIETNAMESE SETTLERS,THEY BECOME ARROGANT AND MISTREAT THE CAMBODIAN 
PEOPLE IN THIS CRUEL MANNER.
Injured Khmer Krom monk during an altercation with Hun Sen regime's "agent 
provocateurs"
Trial of Venerable Tim Sakhorn
THE ABOVE EVIDENCE LED TO THIS Cambodia tribunal dispute runs deeper 


Who will prevail: Justice or the Strongman?Tuesday, January 27, 2009By Seth 
MydansInternational Herald Tribune (Paris, France)
PHNOM PENH: At first glance it seems to be simply a numbers game: whether to 
try 5, 10 or more defendants for the deaths of an estimated 1.7 million people 
at the hands of the Khmer Rouge three decades ago.But as a United 
Nations-backed tribunal prepares to hold its first trial session next month, it 
is embroiled in a wrangle over numbers that goes to the heart of longstanding 
concerns about the tribunal's fairness and independence.The Cambodian 
government, critics say, is attempting to limit the scope of the trials for its 
own political reasons, a limit that the critics say would compromise justice 
and could discredit the entire process."To me, it's the credibility of the 
tribunal which is at stake, its integrity and therefore its credibility," said 
Christophe Peschoux, who heads the office of the United Nations High 
Commissioner for Human Rights in Cambodia.The first defendant is the man with 
perhaps the most horrifying record: Kaing Guek Eav, known as Duch, the 
commander of the Tuol Sleng torture house in Phnom Penh, where at least 14,000 
people were sent to their deaths. His trial is to open with a procedural 
hearing, set for Feb. 17, at which more substantive sessions, involving 
witnesses and evidence, are expected to be scheduled.Four other defendants, all 
of whom were members of the Khmer Rouge Central Committee, are also in custody, 
waiting their turns to face charges in crimes that occurred while they were at 
the top of the chain of command from 1975 to 1979. As much as one-fourth of the 
population died from disease, hunger, overwork or execution under the Khmer 
Rouge's brutal Communist rule.Those five defendants are enough, Cambodian 
officials say.But foreign legal experts counter that within reasonable limits, 
the judicial process should not be arbitrarily limited.After a decade of 
difficult and not always friendly negotiations between the United Nations and 
the Cambodians, a hybrid tribunal is in place, with Cambodian and foreign 
co-prosecutors and panels of co-judges in an awkward political and legal 
balancing act. Now, even before Duch's trial gets under way, that balance is 
being tested.Last month the foreign co-prosecutor, a Canadian named Robert 
Petit, submitted six more names to the court for investigation, saying that he 
had gathered enough evidence to support possible charges. Petit's Cambodian 
counterpart, Chea Leang, objected - not on legal grounds, but for reasons that 
appear to reflect the government's position on the trials.Additional 
indictments, the Cambodian prosecutor said, could be destabilizing and would 
cost too much and take too long and would violate the spirit of the tribunal, 
which she said envisioned "only a small number of trials."Prime Minister Hun 
Sen, who bargained hard with the United Nations over the shape and scope of the 
tribunal, has said that trying "four or five people" would be enough, although 
there is no formal limit on the number.Indeed, Peter Maguire, author of "Facing 
Death in Cambodia," suggests that Hun Sen's plan might be to try only Duch - "a 
garden-variety war criminal" - and hope the political defendants die before 
they can be tried and judged.The additional names submitted by Petit have not 
been made public. But people close to the court say that none of them holds a 
significant position in Cambodia's current government.Both Hun Sen and several 
senior members of his government were Khmer Rouge cadre, but experts say they 
do not fall under the scope of the tribunal and are not at risk of 
prosecution.The mandate of the court is to try the top leadership of the Khmer 
Rouge and "those most responsible" for the crimes - that is, people like Duch, 
who oversaw the torture and killing of thousands of people.In Cambodia, though, 
courts do not head off in their own directions without tight control from Hun 
Sen or the people around him. Some advocates of the tribunal - the 
Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia, or ECCC - see it as offering 
Cambodia a model for a more independent judiciary."Some in Phnom Penh are 
apparently frightened that the ECCC might actually succeed - that it might 
serve as an example of accountability that could be applied more widely," said 
James Goldston, executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative."With 
the Feb. 17 start of the first trial fast approaching, now is the moment to 
show that the court is not a tool of the Cambodian government," he said. "The 
court's credibility is on the line."Most Cambodians are eager to see Khmer 
Rouge leaders brought to trial, according to an extensive survey published last 
week by the Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley.But 
the study found that about one-third of people answering the survey had doubts 
about the tribunal's neutrality and independence, perhaps because of their 
experience with their own corrupt and politically controlled 
judiciary.Confidence in the tribunal has also been eroded by allegations of 
kickbacks that are familiar in the Cambodian court system.The allegations have 
left the United Nations with the awkward choice of taking action or being seen 
as condoning corruption.Now, with the dispute between the two co-prosecutors in 
the open, the checks and balances of the hybrid court will meet their first 
major test.The dispute over the number of defendants must now go to a pre-trial 
chamber whose makeup reflects the supermajority structure of the tribunal, 
which is made up of three Cambodian judges and two foreigners. One of the 
foreign judges must join the Cambodians, in a four-vote majority, for a 
decision to prevail.If the panel is deadlocked three to two, according to court 
rules, the prosecution must proceed.But court watchers said it remained to be 
seen how cooperative the Cambodian staff would be if the government did not 
want those cases to move forward.There is nothing so far to suggest that this 
process will not work as it should, said David Scheffer, a law professor at 
Northwestern University School of Law who took part in negotiations to create 
the tribunal.The real test, he said in a recent article in The Phnom Penh Post 
newspaper, will be whether the judges in the pre-trial chamber "step up to the 
plate and do their duty with the highest degree of judicial integrity.""We can 
all assess that when their decision is rendered," he said.> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 
2009 08:38:31 -0800> Subject: Re: Hun Sen’s Political Purges> From: 
[email protected]> To: [email protected]> > > So a leader 
should keep those who deep to destroy him?> Can you tell us which leader has 
done that?> If it's you, you would do the same. You will remove those who are> 
against if1 you can do it under your command.> > > On Jan 25, 9:17 pm, 
khmerization junior <[email protected]>> wrote:> > Dear All,> > The only 
obvious explanation to his sacking is that Gen. Ke Kimyan is a very> > honest 
military leader who is very popular within the Cambodian People's> > Party and 
within the military ranks. He could be a potential political> > threat and a 
serious rival to Mr. Hun Sen's political future. As a> > consequence, Gen. Ke 
Kimyan has to be sacked, not because of his> > impropriety, but rather because 
of Mr. Hun Sen's insatiable thirst for a> > political conquest through purges 
of political opponents and rivals in his> > quest for a political supremacy. To 
read the full text click below:> > Hun Sen's Political> > 
Purges<http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2009/01/hun-sens-political-purges.html>>
 </html_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® goes where you go. On a PC, on the Web, on your phone. 
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/learnmore/versatility.aspx#mobile?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_WL_HM_versatility_121208
 
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to