On Feb 7, 4:26 pm, Westernstarr <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is so absolutely naive and downright dumb to see and think that Hun Sen
> is a civilian leader, while the man controls just about every military
> commander in the whole country. Basically, Hun Sen is a military dictator.
>
It may be so. Yet, it still doesn't make Hun Sen dum.
Remember! he has been that way for a very long time. Yet, Cambodia is
where it is today under his leadership. Is Cambodia better than it was
twenty years ago?
These are facts, not whether one likes Hun Sen or not.
> Likewise, it naive to think that democracy is measured by the number of
> elections held and the number of international observers turing up a few
> minutes at the polling booths.
>
Now, let the world see this paragraph.
Once, many Cambodians cried for fair election.
Now, they just had the best election Cambodians have ever had.
What do they want now?
Ofcourse, they want a certain way, a certain type of democracy, a
certain government of what they think it ought to be.
Is that called democracy?
Is that called improvement?
This is exaxtly the mentality of the Cambodian opposition parties. No
matter how CPP does, it's all wrong. No matter what the outcome from
the CPP is, it's all wrong. The reason is that they want their own
people to have that job. They hate CPP. They can't accept any outcome
from CPP. Isn't it the mentality of Sam Rainsy? Isn't it the mentality
of Cambodians, which lead them to civil war from one generation to
another? Remember ! the flip flop of Sihanouk? He wanted his power so
bad. He would do anything to get it. It means that the interest of his
country is second to his power. The same applies here. Sam Rainsy has
been doing the same thing. He wants his clan to hate their couterpart,
which was their fellowed Cambodian citizens. Fortunately, Cambodians
know better now after years of fighting each others. They voted them
out. Sam Rainsy and his clan now has very little to fight on.
Cambodians have rejected them through their most fair election they
have ever had.
SO ARE YOU REJECTING THAT?
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:36 PM, rattanakiri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I do not think Hun sen fired Ke Kimyan because he was very honest
> > military leader. This guy lowns land from Kampot to Poipat
> > Hun sen fired him because he allied himself with Hun Sen opponent
> > politically. Whenever civilian leader can fire military leader, it is a
> > good thing people. Bush fired (forced retirement) generals who do not
> > listen to him. That is democracy, civilian leader is the boss.
> > khmerization junior wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > > The only obvious explanation to his sacking is that Gen. Ke Kimyan is
> > > a very honest military leader who is very popular within the Cambodian
> > > People's Party and within the military ranks. He could be a potential
> > > political threat and a serious rival to Mr. Hun Sen's political
> > > future. As a consequence, Gen. Ke Kimyan has to be sacked, not because
> > > of his impropriety, but rather because of Mr. Hun Sen's insatiable
> > > thirst for a political conquest through purges of political opponents
> > > and rivals in his quest for a political supremacy. To read the full
> > > text click below:
>
> > > Hun Sen's Political Purges
> > > <
> >http://khmerization.blogspot.com/2009/01/hun-sens-political-purges.html>-
> >Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
