On Mar 18, 2:02 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> If Cambodia is still moving in the current path, it cannot avoid from
> devastating. It is just a sign of a "weak state under the control of a
> strong man with his patrimonial vein". Patrimony and patronage system like
> current Cambodia cannot move any further of progress, it is just a "ah kvak
> ah kven tale" in Cambodia literature.
>
If it's so bad, why Cambodia is where it is today?
If it's so bad, why are many nations investing in Cambodia today?
If it's so bad, why are Cambodians enjoying their lives today?
> A simple question for all Cambodian people to consider is: do Cambodians
> want to develop democracy or do Cambodians want to develop economy?
>
Cambodians know their country better than anyone on earth. They are
living it.
Cambodians demonstrated clearly of how they want their country to be
through a fair election.
They demonstrated it clearly. They rejected the attitude of division.
They rejected Sam Rainsy and his party.
> Some Cambodians might think that democracy is not important, economy and
> jobs are important. Or some might think that when people have good job and
> good family economy, the democracy will be easily developed. All these
> questions are moving around the debate by both the ordinary people, the
> elites, and the learned people.
>
No matter how others think. The Cambodian people own their own
country. They know what they want for their country.
If they want destruction, who can stop them.
If they want prosperity, who can stop them.
No other nation on earth should force Cambodians to do anything. They
may guide them. But don't tell them how to live their lives.
Cambodia is an independent nation. Let them live their own destiny.
> But all these debates and questions are just the subversion from the
> reality. CPP understands well on how to subvert the attention of Cambodian
> people or to manipulate the them.
>
It is very simple to understand. CPP has been in power for a very
long time. Everyone has seen the products of their endeavor. Why can't
Cambodians reject them it they see it as bad things for their country?
Why are they voting for CPP instead of Sam Rainsy?
That's what they want for their own country.
If Sam Rainsy and his party are so good for their nation, they could
have voted for them already. Instead, they denied them.
This is the reality.
> In reality, Cambodia has accounted neither economic development nor
> democracy enhancement. When, we talk about the democracy, the major has to
> respect the minor. But it is not like that because CPP's outspoken men will
> try to bully the minor SRP with many different political rhetorics. For
> instance, the PM had said this party is trying to victimize the major. When
> SRP proposes some collective concerns involving the nation, CPP will see
> SRP's proposal as non-sense or political oriented etc
>
My friend,
The international monitor called the last election as the fairest
election Cambodians ever held since the war.
The Cambodian people rejected Sam Rainsy party because they know full
well that Sam Rainsy and his party can't do anything.
They know what they have had with CPP. They know how to compare them.
They know how to vote.
In the last election, they rejected the chaos. They voted for the
party who has lead them so far to today.
If they really don't like CPP,
If they think that CPP has sold their country to Vietnam, they could
have voted them out. Insted, they voted them in.
That's their voice. And are you telling us that they are wrong?
How can you consider yourself better than the Cambodian people?
> How Cambodia democracy can be developed when the rule of laws and the check
> and ballance have been shied away?
>
No matter how good democracy is, Cambodians have demonstrated clearly
what they want and don't want.
They voted for CPP and rejected SAM RAINSY.
One can cry all they want. Cambodia is the nation of the Cambodian
people. They know wha tthey want for their country.
> On the other hand, how Cambodia can develop her economic when potential
> sectors such as agriculture, tourism and industry have never got any proper
> plan to develop in a sustainable trajectory? How Cambodia can develop its
> economy when this country is hugely depending on foreign aid. Previously,
> the government has showed its well done job in attracting foreign aid, but
> showed its inability of implementing the essence of the property laws, the
> corruption law, and the diversification of national economy.
>
Who has the right to make the judgement?
Cambodia has developped their country thus far under the leadership of
CPP. And they are enjoying it.
Cambodia has not been thus far for a very long time. What do you want?
Do you want them to move backward to depression just in the name of
democracy?
Cambodians do what deem to be good for them. They care more or less
what the outsiders are saying. They are the ones who live through it.
> Cambodia should change its approach from current dumb vision of moving no
> way to moving in an cunning way: to project the rule of laws for the nation
> such as property rights, corruption law; to develop economy of
> self-reliance; and to create the sphere of national unity by coordinating
> with all political parties, respecting and providing full freedom of speech,
> and accelerating the effectiveness of youth education etc
>
SHOULD is the key.
They should do this and that etc....
Yet they are not doing it because that's what they want for their own
county.
You must respect that.
> If Cambodia is still moving in the current path, it cannot avoid from
> devastating. It is just a sign of a "weak state under the control of a
> strong man with his patrimonial vein". Patrimony and patronage system like
> current Cambodia cannot move any further of progress, it is just a "ah kvak
> ah kven tale" in Cambodia literature.
>
People have been saying this for decades. Yet, Cambodia has been
growing.
They manage their own country as they know how. They enjoy it.
Many oversea people have been trying to steer Cambodia to do what they
don't want.
Sam Rainsy came from oversea bringing something Cambodians don't
want.
Sam Rainsy can yell how great democracy is etc....., Cambodians have
all rights to reject it.
And they did.
> Below is the letter from SRP's PMs who are trying to ensure that Cambodia
> has democracy.
>
Sam Rainsy and his party are dead.
The Cambodian people have rejected them.
> <http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_jVCbxaOxjhA/ScCZ72xMFhI/AAAAAAAAAQA/jNe2Lvt...>
> <http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jVCbxaOxjhA/ScCZyXLY1kI/AAAAAAAAAP4/mxQDP9S...>
> KY
>
> --
> Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless
> strivings of Cambodian Younger
> Generation!http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language.
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
