It looks like you really can't read English well enough to unerderstand. The international montors have given the last election as the best election Cambodians have ever held since the war. And they rejected Sam Rainsy and his party clearly. Before there were people still thought how good Sam Rainsy was. Now, they fully understand that Sam Rainsy and his party are nothing but division. They are trying to divide Cambodia as their predecessors had done in the past. That's why Cambodians have been fighting each others for a very long time. Then they put the blame on Vietnamese, USA ETC......... What kind of people are they? Are they intelligent enough to destroy their own country and kill their own people? That's right. Cambodians are famous on that. They have made the world worse history in genocide on their own people. Sam Rainsy and his party want to bring Cambodia through the same path. They want to divide Cambodia into pieces. They went so far to label their own people in leadership like Hun Sen as Vietnamese. They know full well that those people are Cambodians. Why can't he deal with his people? Ofcourse, SAM RAINSY AND HIS PARTY WANT THE POWER TO THEMSELVES. They don't want any cooperation. They want division. SAM RAINSY AND HIS PARTY ARE THE DIVISION.
On Mar 19, 11:07 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't understand what you want to say Kangaroo? Do you respond to me > or to Baury? It seems you are so manipulative. > > And about CPP's election victory, have you read the below article? > > Last time in 2nd Episode I described "the statement of Cambodia Prime > Minister to discard the National Congress from National Constitution, > his fearful political rhetoric to jeopardize the people, and the use > of major parliamentary to lift opposition immunity without conscience" > are the sign of leader's inability to protect the constitution, to > provide rubric for bottom-line people, and lacking of check and > balance of power...which all these showcase the characteristic of > "weak state" that "strongman" is perpetuating to consolidate his > power. > > CPP is leading major voice in the assembly but this party is not > relevant to the amount of valid votes. CPP is leading the major voice > in the assembly but this party is far away from all vote registrants > of 8 millions. CPP is leading the major voice in the assembly but this > party is very very far way from the total Cambodian population (14 > millions). > > This time I will concentrate on the "Cambodia Election" has been used > as the mean to legitimize personal power. And this practice is showing > Cambodia as one of the weak states lacking willingness to implement > "the rule of law". Major Cambodian people might see the victory of CPP > in recent national election (27 July 2008) as their proud victory, but > observers and academic analysts see this election as a game of "power > legitimacy". There are numerous complaints made by Opposition Parties > about the unequal media distribution, ballot irregularities, vote > buying, intimidation, bias National Election Committee (NEC), and > other disenfranchisement etc. But all these might not be relevant like > "the very low participation of the voters". > > When we are looking at the numbers of vote registrants, we satisfy > with that. There were about 8 million registrants or around 60 percent > (8/14 millions). But when we look at the actual valid vote number, > there are around 6 millions cast their ballots (or 6,010,277 total > valid votes). So we can say that 2 millions skeptically lost their > chance to cast the ballot. But when we look at the vote numbers > casting for CPP, there are around 3 millions (3,492,374 votes). This > number is not significant for CPP to receive major seats in the > assembly at all. However, CPP is taking absolute major voice in the > parliament. This party is holding 90 seats among all 123 seats. > > This 90 seats don't correctly reflect the 5.4 percent votes cast for > CPP at all. CPP is leading major voice in the assembly but this party > is not relevant to the amount of valid votes. CPP is leading the major > voice in the assembly but this party is far away from all vote > registrants of 8 millions. CPP is leading the major voice in the > assembly but this party is very very far way from the total Cambodian > population (14 millions). This election figure tells us the myth of > political legimacy gained by the CPP in Cambodia. Comparing 3.4 > million voted for CPP with 14 millions of total population surely > informs us the "weakness" of Cambodia nation. It is weak because the > 90 seats of major voice really doesn't reflect the support of > Cambodians. CPP is lacking support from Cambodian people, but why > opposition party cannot step into this situation? This also shows the > "weakness" of Cambodia nation. Opposition needs to warm up themselves > a little bit. CPP is not truly leading opposition party in a strong > manner, but in a weak manner and manipulation. > > In conclusion, CPP is proud of its victory over election just for > their own power and interest. But CPP's winning of electiion truly > informs us the "The Strongman in a Weak State". > > KY > > On Mar 19, 4:45 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > It looks like Khmer Young can't back up what he claimed. > > Perhaps, he doesn't really know what he is saying. > > Perhaps, he is bing hit on the spot. > > Perhaps, he is just a typical Cambodians who behave this way. > > > On Mar 18, 2:13 pm, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Kangaroo, > > > > I know your responding is not different from government's spokesman. > > > It is just the responding from a character of Khmer Rouge leaders. > > > Once Pol Pot boasted that Cambodia will not listen to anyone, they > > > developed their own mastery and supremacy. Now your responding to my > > > thought is like that. But yours is more dangerous than Pol Pot's > > > because Pol Pot responded to their group of leaders only, but yours or > > > the CPP's will use Cambodian people as their tool. Everything good or > > > bad they will blame the Cambodian people. Through the election, how > > > Cambodian people trusted CPP, read below essay: > > > --------------------------- > > > Monday, March 9, 2009 > > > Election for Power Legitimacy in Cambodia: 3rd Episode "A Strongman in > > > a Weak State" > > > Last time in 2nd Episode I described "the statement of Cambodia Prime > > > Minister to discard the National Congress from National Constitution, > > > his fearful political rhetoric to jeopardize the people, and the use > > > of major parliamentary to lift opposition immunity without conscience" > > > are the sign of leader's inability to protect the constitution, to > > > provide rubric for bottom-line people, and lacking of check and > > > balance of power...which all these showcase the characteristic of > > > "weak state" that "strongman" is perpetuating to consolidate his > > > power. > > > > CPP is leading major voice in the assembly but this party is not > > > relevant to the amount of valid votes. CPP is leading the major voice > > > in the assembly but this party is far away from all vote registrants > > > of 8 millions. CPP is leading the major voice in the assembly but this > > > party is very very far way from the total Cambodian population (14 > > > millions). > > > > This time I will concentrate on the "Cambodia Election" has been used > > > as the mean to legitimize personal power. And this practice is showing > > > Cambodia as one of the weak states lacking willingness to implement > > > "the rule of law". Major Cambodian people might see the victory of CPP > > > in recent national election (27 July 2008) as their proud victory, but > > > observers and academic analysts see this election as a game of "power > > > legitimacy". There are numerous complaints made by Opposition Parties > > > about the unequal media distribution, ballot irregularities, vote > > > buying, intimidation, bias National Election Committee (NEC), and > > > other disenfranchisement etc. But all these might not be relevant like > > > "the very low participation of the voters". > > > > When we are looking at the numbers of vote registrants, we satisfy > > > with that. There were about 8 million registrants or around 60 percent > > > (8/14 millions). But when we look at the actual valid vote number, > > > there are around 6 millions cast their ballots (or 6,010,277 total > > > valid votes). So we can say that 2 millions skeptically lost their > > > chance to cast the ballot. But when we look at the vote numbers > > > casting for CPP, there are around 3 millions (3,492,374 votes). This > > > number is not significant for CPP to receive major seats in the > > > assembly at all. However, CPP is taking absolute major voice in the > > > parliament. This party is holding 90 seats among all 123 seats. > > > > This 90 seats don't correctly reflect the 5.4 percent votes cast for > > > CPP at all. CPP is leading major voice in the assembly but this party > > > is not relevant to the amount of valid votes. CPP is leading the major > > > voice in the assembly but this party is far away from all vote > > > registrants of 8 millions. CPP is leading the major voice in the > > > assembly but this party is very very far way from the total Cambodian > > > population (14 millions). This election figure tells us the myth of > > > political legimacy gained by the CPP in Cambodia. Comparing 3.4 > > > million voted for CPP with 14 millions of total population surely > > > informs us the "weakness" of Cambodia nation. It is weak because the > > > 90 seats of major voice really doesn't reflect the support of > > > Cambodians. CPP is lacking support from Cambodian people, but why > > > opposition party cannot step into this situation? This also shows the > > > "weakness" of Cambodia nation. Opposition needs to warm up themselves > > > a little bit. CPP is not truly leading opposition party in a strong > > > manner, but in a weak manner and manipulation. > > > > In conclusion, CPP is proud of its victory over election just for > > > their own power and interest. But CPP's winning of electiion truly > > > informs us the "The Strongman in a Weak State". > > > > KY > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Mar 18, 12:35 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mar 18, 2:02 am, Khmer Young <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > If Cambodia is still moving in the current path, it cannot avoid from > > > > > devastating. It is just a sign of a "weak state under the control of a > > > > > strong man with his patrimonial vein". Patrimony and patronage system > > > > > like > > > > > current Cambodia cannot move any further of progress, it is just a > > > > > "ah kvak > > > > > ah kven tale" in Cambodia literature. > > > > > If it's so bad, why Cambodia is where it is today? > > > > If it's so bad, why are many nations investing in Cambodia today? > > > > If it's so bad, why are Cambodians enjoying their lives today? > > > > > > A simple question for all Cambodian people to consider is: do > > > > > Cambodians > > > > > want to develop democracy or do Cambodians want to develop economy? > > > > > Cambodians know their country better than anyone on earth. They are > > > > living it. > > > > Cambodians demonstrated clearly of how they want their country to be > > > > through a fair election. > > ... > > read more »- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
