Dear Kangaroo, Like I said, just checking your logic. That's all. :)
Have a good day. Respectfully yours, Jay On Aug 31, 8:44 am, kangaroo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 30, 12:40 pm, Jayakhmer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear Kangaroo, > > > “You are getting back in the right track. You can blame Vietnam for > > anything you want. You cannot change the fact that everything has > > been > > done by the hands of Cambodians over Cambodians in Cambodia. No > > matter > > how you believe it. This is the fact.You can blame Vietnam all you > > want. As long as some Cambodians do it over their own people, it is > > not Vietnam who are guilty. Cambodians are mostly guilty first. They > > are not victims. > > Stop blaming others for their own illnesses.” > > > There seems to be a flaw in this logic. I am not arguing fact here. > > I merely want to clarify your thinking here. > > > Suppose a driver drives a car and hits (or kills) a pedestrian, in > > this case, is it the driver at fault or the driver, in your mind, > > bears no responsibility at all? > > Don't try to suppose anything. You just said it yourself that you are > not going to dispute the facts. > Cambodians killed Cambodians. Vietnamese did not. > In your example, you didn't understand it yourself. The driver did > control the car and hit the pedestrian. That's his fault. In Cambodian > case, Cambodians killed Cambodians. Whose fault is that? > Are you getting it? > > I think you need to rethink about your example. Please allow me to tap > your head a little because you don't seem to know that you are > destroying your own thought. > First of all, You didn't understand what my opinion means. Please read > it careful. > Second, you bring an example that proves my point, which you didn't > seem to grasp it. > Third, the responsibility of your example doesn't fit your thought. > > Please read it again. > > > It is safe to infer from your logic above here that you seem to argue > > that it was in fact the bumper that actually hits that pedestrian; > > therefore, the bumper only responsible for the killing. > > No, you are wrong. The fact is that the driver controlled the car. He > is responsible for his own acts. > In the Cambodian case, Cambodians killed Cambodians whether they > listen to Vietnamese or not. > Are you getting it? > I am pretty sure you don't because you are coming out with something > that you don't even understand your own statement. > > > Let’s suppose further that Vietnam was the driver in this case and the > > Khmer Rouge were the bumpers, in your thinking, does Vietnam bear any > > responsibility here? > > I have said many times. Whatever Vietnamese had inserted themselves > into Cambodian matter or not, they had no responsibility for what > Cambodians had done to their own people. Vietnamese didn't do the act. > Cambodians did. You can put on Vietnamese all you want, the fact is > that Cambodians are so stupid enough to allow Vietnamese to drive > their heads to kill their own people and country. What kind of animals > are they? > No matter what you think, the facts say it all. Cambodians kill > Cambodians. Whose respoinsibility is that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
