On Aug 30, 12:40 pm, Jayakhmer <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Kangaroo, > > “You are getting back in the right track. You can blame Vietnam for > anything you want. You cannot change the fact that everything has > been > done by the hands of Cambodians over Cambodians in Cambodia. No > matter > how you believe it. This is the fact.You can blame Vietnam all you > want. As long as some Cambodians do it over their own people, it is > not Vietnam who are guilty. Cambodians are mostly guilty first. They > are not victims. > Stop blaming others for their own illnesses.” > > There seems to be a flaw in this logic. I am not arguing fact here. > I merely want to clarify your thinking here. > > Suppose a driver drives a car and hits (or kills) a pedestrian, in > this case, is it the driver at fault or the driver, in your mind, > bears no responsibility at all? >
Don't try to suppose anything. You just said it yourself that you are not going to dispute the facts. Cambodians killed Cambodians. Vietnamese did not. In your example, you didn't understand it yourself. The driver did control the car and hit the pedestrian. That's his fault. In Cambodian case, Cambodians killed Cambodians. Whose fault is that? Are you getting it? I think you need to rethink about your example. Please allow me to tap your head a little because you don't seem to know that you are destroying your own thought. First of all, You didn't understand what my opinion means. Please read it careful. Second, you bring an example that proves my point, which you didn't seem to grasp it. Third, the responsibility of your example doesn't fit your thought. Please read it again. > It is safe to infer from your logic above here that you seem to argue > that it was in fact the bumper that actually hits that pedestrian; > therefore, the bumper only responsible for the killing. > No, you are wrong. The fact is that the driver controlled the car. He is responsible for his own acts. In the Cambodian case, Cambodians killed Cambodians whether they listen to Vietnamese or not. Are you getting it? I am pretty sure you don't because you are coming out with something that you don't even understand your own statement. > Let’s suppose further that Vietnam was the driver in this case and the > Khmer Rouge were the bumpers, in your thinking, does Vietnam bear any > responsibility here? > I have said many times. Whatever Vietnamese had inserted themselves into Cambodian matter or not, they had no responsibility for what Cambodians had done to their own people. Vietnamese didn't do the act. Cambodians did. You can put on Vietnamese all you want, the fact is that Cambodians are so stupid enough to allow Vietnamese to drive their heads to kill their own people and country. What kind of animals are they? No matter what you think, the facts say it all. Cambodians kill Cambodians. Whose respoinsibility is that? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
