Bob Mazzullo wrote: > > Wouldn't a large negative require a glass equipped negative carrier? > Is there still sagging of the negative regardless? > > Bob M.... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Yeo > > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [Cameramakers] 8x10 enlarger > > > > > > > I vote vertical - let gravity work for you and not against you. Hang it > > off > > > a solid wall. > > > > > > How would gravity work for you if it's vertical? Gravity pulling the > > (large) negative down in the middle, making it not flat, gravity > > pulling the > > whole head downward, so you have to come up with a more solid track and > > maybe counterweights. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Cameramakers mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers > > _______________________________________________ > Cameramakers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers
I would think an 8 x 10 negative would present problems unless it is supported by glass - which may produce problems of its own - Newton Rings. Just a thought, Regards, Marv _______________________________________________ Cameramakers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers
