Not sure what you mean about between tabs. The edges of the tabs take up all of a couple pixels. That's doesn't bother me.
Legacy?... Well, they look Jaguar, but that's not so bad. It was just that people have been complaining about Panther tabs not really being tabs. I don't mind the Panther way, or having some connectivity with the window content below.
To me, the best way would be for Camino tabs to be unique to Camino, while not looking like another row of links.
S On Mar 1, 2004, at 06•02 A, Michael Watson wrote:
The crappy close icon doesn't bother you? The wasted space above the tabs
doesn't bother you? The extra space wasted between the tabs and the page
itself?
On top of that, it just looks . . . too old. Legacy. It doesn't mesh with
the direction Camino's going, it seems, and doesn't look as "modern", so to
speak, as other Mac OS X browsers.
There's gotta be someone else out there that thinks iCab's tabs don't look
good enough for Camino. Right? *ducks, in case of tomatoes*
I like those tabs. Slap a favicon on there and they'd be great!
S On Feb 29, 2004, at 04•27 P, Steve Benner wrote:
Take a look at the way iCab (http://www.icab.de) does tabs: still by far the prettiest (and most usable) tabbing configuration on OS X, I think.
_______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
