Le samedi 10 décembre 2011 à 15:45 +0100, Xavier Leroy a écrit : > 5- Before embarking on patching the core Caml distribution, it wouldn't hurt > to ask (privately) where the priorities are. For instance, I don't see the > point for a linear-scan allocator (Benedikt Meurer) or more efficient > compilation of value let-rec (Fabrice le Fessant), but anyone who would come > up with a GHC-quality function inliner would be welcome like the Messiah. > Likewise, for many years I've been looking for developers to work on the > Windows port(s) of OCaml and never found any. Finally, at the latest OCaml > consortium meeting, the idea of splitting Camlp4 off the core distribution > was floated around; volunteers to take over its maintenance would be most > welcome.
I am volunteer for the maintenance of Camlp4. But there is something i don't understand here. Why is there camlp4 and camlp5 ? These two projects do exactly the same thing and are incompatible. So i don't see the point of maintaining them both. We should at least deprecate one. Cheers, -- Jérémie -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
