Hi, Jérémie Dimino <[email protected]> writes:
> But there is something i don't understand here. Why is there camlp4 and > camlp5 ? These two projects do exactly the same thing and are > incompatible. So i don't see the point of maintaining them both. We > should at least deprecate one. BTW: Are there any plans to add type reflection to Camlp4 (or Camlp5)? > > Cheers, > > -- > Jérémie Cheers; Wojciech -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
