On 08-03-2012, Gerd Stolpmann <i...@gerd-stolpmann.de> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 08.03.2012, 17:09 +0100 schrieb Jérémie Dimino: >> Le Thu, 8 Mar 2012 01:26:38 +0100, >> Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buen...@erratique.ch> a écrit : >> >> > 1) All the packages I distribute are made of a single module. For now >> > these were just installed as .cmo .cmx .cmxs. Now it seems oasis >> > forces me to create a .mllib even if I have only one module. Is that >> > correct ? >> >> Note that in general it is better to install a cma/cmxa, even if your >> library has only one module. The reason is that when building an >> executable, cmo/cmx files passed on the command line are always linked, >> while unused units of cma/cmxa files are not (unless you specify >> -linkall). > > Right. Just one refinement: if you also install the cmx _in addition to_ > the cmxa, you enable cross-module inlining for this particular module. > This is completely optional. I usually do it only when I think it makes > sense. (Cannot comment on how this is handled in oasis.) >
oasis installs the .cmx by default (if he can found them). No distinction about "if it makes sense"... Cheers, Sylvain Le Gall -- My company: http://www.ocamlcore.com Linkedin: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/sylvainlegall Start an OCaml project here: http://forge.ocamlcore.org OCaml blogs: http://planet.ocamlcore.org -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
