On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Kevin Marks <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't image permanodes already have thumbnails attached? Presumably you > could expand the definition to point to original version or subsequent > edits.
My concerns is that we're associating things like thumbnails and tags with *files*, not with the underlying "image". I get that it's a fine hair to split, but I think it is legimitately important to make the concept of an object that is media in of itself a first-class concept that we build files on top of rather than retrofitting tagging to files after the fact. -- Aleksa Sarai (cyphar) www.cyphar.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Camlistore" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
