I can see your point... I'm not expert enough to have much of an opinion, but it does seem worth considering...
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 10:59, Aleksa Sarai <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but Camlistore allows a "blob" object to be > > input... just bytes. That can have a permanode with attached tags, etc. > > Yes, that is true. > > > It's just the FUSE (and web interface) that has chosen to implement these > > via files... > > And camput file. Not to mention that AFAIK you can't get the webui to display > things if you hand-crafted the schema I'm proposing. Besides, the point of > the proposal is to make the default file-based schema more generic and less > obsessed with the concept of files. > > > So (and I may be misunderstanding you), it seems like Camlistore supports > > what you are saying at a storage level, its just not being done that way... > > Yes, and I'm suggesting that we subtly change the schema so that it has more > semantic information and extendability. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Camlistore" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Camlistore" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
