> >Bruce Napier wrote: > > > On the issue of them and us, I can't agree with Sue - we > > share ideas, info, glasses of wine with whoever seems > > amenable, regardless of what kind of boating they do. It > > would be awful if the system only contained boats like Sanity > > or LT or UM or Albion (you can see I'm disposed to be > > generous after my second pint ;-} ), but I do object to the > > mouldering, unlicensed, uninsured hulks owned by freeloaders. > > David Mack wrote
I'm with you on the "unlicensed" and "uninsured", but the cut would be a >poorer place if all the "mouldering hulks" were cleansed from the >system. > Who and how would they decide its a mouldering hulk?? It could be as someone said, the outside might be waiting for paint, but the inside is like a floating palace. The fisherman must buy a rod licence and then either pay for membership of a club that has its own water, or be prepared to pay for a day licence. I do know that a lake near our boat has been leased to a fishing club for £5,000.00 for five years. I'm still confused about people saying about boats not having a licence when they are paying per month? can someone please explain. Moose & Maria nb Daisybob _________________________________________________________________ Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
