>
>My conclusion is that now is the time to revive the proposal to
>transfer the EA navigations (and the current funding of them, and
>their in-the-field staff) to BW.
>
>This transfer will produce savings from eliminating EA Navigation's
>head office, and economies of scale from unified procurement and
>expertise. More important, BW will be able to start entrepreneurial
>schemes on the former-EA waterways to enhance its income. Also, if a
>real estate endowment for BW can be arranged, it can sensibly be sized
>to take into account the maintenance of those waterways as well as
>BW's current ones.
>
>Finally, it will let BW apply its navigation charges to these
>navigations right away, producing uniform charges nationally and
>removing the need for the expensive Transport & Works Act inquiry EA
>is now facing to take its Harmonisation project forward.
>
>I think this has to be part of the strategy for dealing with the
>funding cuts.
>
>Adrian
>
>Adrian Stott
>07956-299966
Adrian knows my views, which are as follows:-
BW would have a monopoly and could treat boaters precisely how it wished, we
would have no alternative but to go along with it.
No, no and again no. Long live the difference. This of course works both ways.
Sue nb Nackered Navvy
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
