"Roger Millin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Phil wrote:
: > In my very limited experience, have to say that I was very
: disappointed with
: > the Southern Oxford canal.  I found the towpath to be execrable, the
: paddles
: > stiff, and the the gates quite a bit heavier than we experienced on
: the GU.
: > I realize that this canal is less travelled than the GU, and that BW
: isn't
: > always as responsive as they might be regarding towpath maintenance,
: but
: > gosh, you'd think they'd do *something!*
: Hhmm. not sure I'd agree with you about that Phil. *In places* the
: towpath is poor, I've not found the paddle gear particularly bad and
: the gates are fine. It's a lovely rural waterway with, in places, an
: excess of unlicensed, overstaying moorers IMO. Worth doing though for
: gentle rural scenery.
: Sounds like you need to eat more Weetabix before you come over! ;-)))

I would also suggest it sees more traffic than the GU

-- 
Brian Ancient Order of Sewer Ants

Visit this site and help save our waterways
 http://www.savethewaterways.org.uk/ 


Reply via email to