David Cragg wrote: > I'll second that. But what should the fee be? One way to look at it would be to take the average a boater pays - so the average of a typical end-of-garden and marina "connection" charge.
The other way, would be to keep BW's revenue roughly constant. So the total revenue from end-of-garden fees, "connection" changes, that part of BW's own mooring rates that they count as equivalent to EoG etc. All divided by the total number of licenses. Comparing the two would give an idea of possible problems with the system.
