Ron Jones wrote:
> Nick wrote:
>> Adrian Stott wrote:
>>> Steve Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>> It also feels like another argument for the "add a basic mooring
>> charge to all licenses, reduce mooring fees that currently include an
>> element paid to BW by this much).
> 
> Difficult when not all marinas have to pay a connection charge to BW, so 
> there would be no easy way for the marina to reduce it's fees - except by 
> some more expensive burocratic system of claiming the fees back...

I'm always reluctant to suggest increasing costs anywhere, but it's hard 
to see why - for other than historical reasons - this discrepancy exists.


The "right" position to end up with is that everyone pays a contribution 
to BW as part of their license that allows them to moor a boat whenever 
they are on BW waters (you can argue that this ought to be something 
that is in a license anyway, but BW seem to have been allowed to win 
this one by default).   That's then it.  It doesn't matter if your boat 
is sometimes moored on a river off BW navigations, or on your own 
garden, or in a flashy marina, or at various places around the system as 
you travel.  If you have a BW license you have the right to moor 
legally, and whether you pay anyone anything for this is a matter 
between the two of you and nothing for BW.

So this would mean, starting from where we are now:
- people without any permanent mooring would pay the new fee, but that 
would be the end of the argument about "continuous cruisers/moorers" - 
anything residual should be handled by enforcing visitor mooring regs
- people with end-of-garden moorings would pay the same or less 
depending on what the sum was set at.
- people in basins with a BW connection charge ought to pay roughly the 
same, but I bet we'd pay more
- people in the situation you've described would pay more
- people on BW moorings would pay the same or perhaps a bit less.

Not ideal - as I said, I don't want to make anyone pay more.  But the 
current situation where those moored on their own land pay more than 
those moored on various bits of BWs is clearly iniquitous.

Reply via email to