2008/12/11 peterjohnscott [email protected]

> The principle of priority to the Ship Canal has been the same since the
> Ship Canal was completed - clearly a bad idea to have a ship wait for
> the aqueduct and miss a tide, particularly as it takes so long
> (15mins?) to complete a 'swing'.


A really interesting posting, Peter. But the last two times I've crossed it
- 2007 and 2006 - it was fixed to give priority to the Bridgewater. I went
straight over both times and it seemed unmanned. Are you saying that what
was unusual is not the priority which I experienced given to the MSC in
1984, but the priority given to the Bridgewater more recently?

Steve


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to